this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
23 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24733 readers
2724 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We tried to warn you

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yep an Administration is more than just the president. It's the competent people that surround him. Instead of having a president suffering from lapses surrounded by some of the best most competent people. Now we have an idiot surrounded by sycophants and sociopaths. This is so much better/s

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

As opposed to the sycophants that hid biden's mental decline?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That you think the two are remotely similar, shows how disingenuous you are. That you imply that this was unusual or even noteworthy at this point. Implies your ignorance of even relatively recent history. You do realize you've breached your instances echo chambers.

I never actually advocated for either candidate. But we told you it was going to be a Democrat or Republican regardless of what we wanted. But people like yourself actively ignored what was actually on the ballot. Instead campaigning to assist the fascist. Which is unsurprising. Someone from a pro authoritarian instance feeling more comfortable getting a fellow authoritarian elected.

We all want better. But we'll never achieve it. Because so many of you fail to understand the basic assignment or options available. Doing more harm than good in all the uninformed flailing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Liberals will never get anywhere until they realize their own party is complicit in that fascism. It didn't happen in a vacuum. Fascism always is enabled by a weak, or perceived weak, liberal party.

Liberals always claim they want better but they proceed to vote for the things that are preventing things from getting better. They're the greatest enemies to progress, they talk as if they want change, but they demand things stay the same

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree and tankies like you are just as bad

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tankie is to liberal what woke is to maga

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

centrists really don't like it when you point out that they shriek "tankie" at the left while kissing republican ass.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

some are definitely sycophants; but i think most are useful idiots and i think you're seeing here how effectively they're being redirected by shills and other idiots to the re-frame the discourse away from biden and onto trump; i hope you continue to persist despite their downvotes and their attempts to goad you into getting banned or making you turn away from your efforts.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lol

"Don't worry about Trump guys, he's doing great! Keep up the good fight against Joe Biden, he's the real enemy! I'm totally a real person that 100% came up with this original thought that I 100% believe in on my own."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Covert bot reference?

Sounds like a rule violation

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

It's retroactive sarcasm.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've fought ignorance for decades, this is no different

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

You seem to have lost that battle.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep an Administration is more than just the president. It's the competent people that surround him.

Yeah, having a bunch of anti-worker, pro-coporate, war-mongers led to people being desperate enough to vote for Trump. Maybe Biden should have done something about that when he had the chance, so that people wouldn't be so disenfranchised with the Democrats that made Trump seem eligible.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes he should have I agree. But I also think that a lot of the people screeching about Gaza Etc should not have Amplified fascist talking points and made it worse. The fact that a lot of these people thought Trump was better than Biden simply because people weren't talking about Trump being exactly the same or worse is just as damning as anything the Democrats did. And it's pathetic to see so many of you try to shirk any blame for this and put it all on the democrats. They definitely deserve their fair share. But so do you all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which fascist talking points? That genocide is unpopular? That screwing over the working class was a bad idea? That alienating your voter-base during an election is a bad idea? That putting up a candidate that were in clear cognitive decline was a bad idea?

If the Democrats had listened to us, instead of handing the election to Trump on a silver platter, we wouldn't be where we are today. We spent all our time calling out Biden and the Democrats specfically to avoid getting Trump reelected. The Democratic leadership are the ones that told us to fuck off when we tried to get them to stop making obvious mistakes, and start running serious candidates.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's pretty sad if you don't even know, Steve Bannon said it himself. Flood the zone. For any talk about the Republicans or Trump's stance in particular. There were hundreds to thousands of more articles or news stories focusing only on Biden.

It was ignorant, if not down right foolish to think that dog piling on the Democrats in the middle of a contentious election was going to change things for the better. We've got 50 plus years of evidence to the contrary. None of this is a defense of Democrats or an excuse. They all need to be replaced. Democrats and Republicans and ultimately all national parties need to be outlawed and dissolved. But the left needs to do better, and focus on things other than Purity tests. When both options are shitty we need to stop effectively aiding the shittiest.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Running unpopular candidates with unpopular positions is a bad idea. And being unwilling to call the DNC out for it is why we got such terrible candidates. Biden was the Emperor with New Clothes, and everyone could clearly see that. To place the blame on those who wanted a candidate that was popular with voters, instead of a naked emperor is disingenuous.