this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
127 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

33359 readers
1297 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why isn't this a popular thing?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Because that would be a nightmare. "I'll meet you for lunch at 2AM", "No, I had a huge breakfast yesterday". You would need to relearn the times every time you went to a different place, "oh, right, the restaurants only serve lunch until 10AM" or "Sorry sir, but there's an extra fee for night time services starting 1PM". Those are much more likely day-to-day phrases than scheduling a meeting with someone from another continent. And you don't gain anything by this, because whenever you're communicating across timezones you can simply use UTC as a standard and everyone knows how to convert that to their own time. So there's no good reason and a lot of drawbacks.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

I am baffled that needs explanation!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Only because we're already familiar with the current way of doing things, though. If we had all been on UTC for our entire lives, it would be a simple matter of getting to a new place, asking when local noon is, and going about our business.

"Hey, when is local noon here?"

"'bout 0330."

"Cool, thanks. Want to get together for drinks tomorrow night? Say, around 1045?"

They're all just numbers. They have no inherent meaning, only what we imbue then with.

It would get a little bit tricky with the date switching over in the middle of the day, of course. In my mind, that's the biggest reason.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So every time you deal with somebody in a different location, you can't assume anything about the hours and times you have to ask them or go look it up Even if you have a decent idea where they live because you're not going to know the time disparity of every city out there.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So… like it is already? Ever tried to call someone in a different time zone? It’s fine-ish 1 or maybe 2 hours off, but much beyond that still requires a minimum of research.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Okay, I get it, you don't know time zones already so you have to research every time but most people don't think of the other people please.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your ring up a person, they go "why the fuck are you calling me at 09:45?", sounding really upset. You don't understand why. He's in a place where that means it's the middle of the night and as a local he understands it.

Oooor

He could just say "do you know what time it is here? It's two am!" and you'd understand.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, in this hypothetical scenario, he wouldn't complain about it being 0945 because he's grown up in a world where that's ambiguous. He's going to say, "Don't you know it's the middle of the night here?!"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

because he's grown up in a world where that's ambiguous

No he hasn't. Never moved a or traveled outside his own city.

That why this "make everyones time the same" is about as smart as an idea as shoving Lego up your nose.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting that this is a world without the internet or international television programs? He's going to know that hours are different everywhere, especially if he has friends in other regions.

That why this "make everyones time the same" is about as smart as an idea as shoving Lego up your nose.

Only because the current way is the one you know. In this alternate universe where the whole world has always been on UTC and someone posted a question on Lemmy asking why the whole planet isn't divided up into 1-hour offsets with their own times, that universe's version of you would be just as irrationally angry with that universe's version of me for daring to suggest that the time zone idea is no less irrational than the UTC idea.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I can't believe you're being serious. Literally, I have a hard time believing you aren't pretending to be that simple.

Only because the current way is the one you know. In this alternate universe where the whole world has always been on UTC

You don't understand time zones or geopolitical history either it seems, and you're imaging people from thousands of years ago to have a concept of universality. I can't thank you enough for the roaring belly laughs I've gotten from reading your brain farts.

You're not proposing a single improvement, you're making the system actively much much much shittier

planet isn't divided up into 1-hour offsets with their own times, that universe's version

Except it is, because that's how hours work. You probably don't know where they come from either

I know it seems to you like you're making sense, but you're not, because you're ignorant of so many assumptions you've made, which if changed, would be like giving ancient Romans the GPS instead of them using sundials and that said Romans would've magically been able to consider that theyre noon is two hours after "the real" noon, which is based on.........?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're assuming an awful lot about me based on complete ignorance and using those assumptions to justify a really bizarre level of abuse.

You don't understand time zones or geopolitical history either it seems, and you're imaging people from thousands of years ago to have a concept of universality.

I'm not. That's literally the premise of the idea proposed here. The fact that you don't get that is really making me question your reading comprehension abilities.

You're not proposing a single improvement,

Correct. I'm not. As I've noted several times now, I'm not proposing anything. I'm just pointing out that we have a significant bias toward the system we already know.

Except it is, because that's how hours work. You probably don't know where they come from either

Yeah, they were chosen more or less arbitrarily by the ancient Egyptians because there were twelve significant constellations they followed, which led to a sort of base-12 number system they used for stuff related to the sky (months and hours in particular).

Again, units and numbers have no inherent meaning. We made it all up. A day could just as easily have had ten hours of 144 minutes each, or 40 hours of 36 minutes each.

I know it seems to you like you're making sense, but you're not...

The fact that you don't understand what I'm saying doesn't mean that I'm not making sense. And I think there's ample evidence here that you're just not reading carefully.

...because you're ignorant of so many assumptions you've made, which if changed, would be like giving ancient Romans the GPS instead of them using sundials and that said Romans would've magically been able to consider that theyre noon is two hours after "the real" noon, which is based on.........?

Ok. Deciphering your word salad here, I think you're trying to suggest that our current 24-hour day and time zones were somehow inevitable? Which...I mean, obviously they aren't, since there are many cultures that independently came up with different time systems.

There's a Hindi clock that divides the day into thirty hours. Roman timekeeping was divided into 12 hours, but that time was measured from sunrise to sunset. Byzantine time uses the same division of days into 24 hours, but starts a day at sunset, meaning that the start of a day changes within the same city throughout the year. France even tried decimal time for a while, where each day has ten hours, each hour has 100 minutes, and each minute has 100 seconds. All of these systems arose from different starting conditions, none of which were "giving Romans GPS" (they already knew the Earth was round) and none of which caused any problems with users going to sleep at different times of day.

The thought experiment here isn't "how could this have happened given existing conditions?" or even "what conditions could have brought this about?" but rather "assuming a world where some set of conditions brought about a true worldwide UTC without offsets, what would it look like to the users of that system?"

And this is what you've decided merits abusive behavior. Can't imagine what you're like about stuff that actually matters.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (32 children)

assuming an awful lot about me based on complete ignorance and

Oh another one of "me saying things doesn't mean anything, you can't deduce I meant something just because I said it!"

I'm not.

You are.

have a significant bias toward the system we already know.

No, you're pretending to be a pseudointellectuel while missing the actual issues shoved down your face, because you lack understanding and your ego is 3 sizes too big for your skills

Yeah, they were chosen more or less arbitrarily by the ancient Egyptians because there were twelve significant constellations they followed, which led to a sort of base-12 number system they used for stuff related to the sky (months and hours in particular).

Exactly like I said. A pretentious pseudointellectuel and I'm not gonna teach you history. Do some desperate googling and then become ashamed

Again, units and numbers have no inherent meaning

Again, they literally have INHERENT meaning.

Send me your address I'll order you a dictionary

And I think there's ample evidence here that you're just not reading carefully

"But but you're laughing at my rhetoric so you can't have read it"

Zzzz

24-hour day and time zones were somehow inevitable

By what fucking logic? You talk to me of reading comprehension :D

You don't understand the fundamental flaw in the system, but like I said, I'm not gonna be lecturing you, I'd rather watch you make a moron of yourself and maybe, maybe point out later what I'm talking about.

There's a Hindi clock that divides the day into thirty hours. Roman timekeeping was divided into 12 hours, but that time was measured from sunrise to sunset. Byzantine time uses the same division of days into 24 hours, but starts a day at sunset, meaning that the start of a day changes within the same city throughout the year. France even tried decimal time for a while, where each day has ten hours, each hour has 100 minutes, and each minute has 100 seconds. All of these systems arose from different starting conditions, none of which were "giving Romans GPS" (they already knew the Earth was round) and none of which caused any problems with users going to sleep at different times of day.

You talk to me of word salad while you're some pseudointellectual 14-year old twerp repeating these sad sixth grade history facts as some unbelievably arcane knowledge while not understanding the fundamental flaw in the whole system.

load more comments (32 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (36 children)

Why exactly is asking for "what time is the local noon" more convenient than asking "what timezone is this"?

How is "local noon is at 2:45" somehow easier to adjust to than "adjust your clock by X hours"? You don't need to relearn every thing like what time breakfast is served when local noon is 08:50.

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Answer quickly, if noon is 0330 what time is dinner, what is a 9-5 job and what time do you expect to have breakfast. There are lots of adjustments you will need to make, whereas with the current system you know that as a general rule you can expect dinner at around 8, most people to work 9-5, and places to serve breakfast at 8 or 9, so you switch your clock when you arrive and you're done.

If you're a local who never moved timezones z then yeah it makes no difference what the numbers are, you would get used to waking up at 9PM and switching date midway through the day, there might even be 2 different words for tomorrow, one for the next day one for the next date, but the moment you traveled to a different location all of your years of being used to general time where things happen go out the window, it's much more of a hassle than adjusting your clock and assuming times will be mostly similar.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yep. I can tell you that dinner would be around 0930, but you're right that the other calculations are tougher.

I'm not saying this would be better. Either system has trade-offs. I'm saying that each of them would be equally weird from the other side.