this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
126 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

72472 readers
2391 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What their job is has nothing to do with my statement. If the only media reporting about a new technology is a video then that thing is significantly more likely to be bullshit

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not reporting on a technology. DIYPerks is a channel about cool projects he does. He shows the build process and explains everything and usually provides plans to follow along

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

i.e. he is reporting about a technology. Again, if the only media reporting about a new technology is a video then that thing is significantly more likely to be bullshit

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I hoped people on Lemmy would be less obtuse than Reddit but oh well

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yes, you're really the one here contributing to the topical discussion 🙄

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He is not reporting. What's there not to get? It's not a news outlet. He just says "I found this neat thing and will now build some insane project around it". I'm sure if you actually went to look, you would find other sources that talk about the technology in detail and probably did so before he made his video

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's literally what reporting means. You don't have to be a news outlet to do a report.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reporting

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Be as pedantic as you want, but "reporting" is coloquially used to describe news. This is more akin to a blog

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I'm not being pedantic, you just don't know what the word means.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

He goes into the downsides of the technology, which you would've known if you had watched it. He's also a very well known, and reputable channel, so I don't see any reason to not trust him.

If you want more than just a video about an emerging tech then why don't you provide an article on it, instead of expecting it from OP, who probably just wanted to post a cool tech video.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not the point. The point is that if this is an attempt at reporting cool new tech usable by the masses, then it should be posted as written coverage. YouTube videos can easily be perceived as content churn rather than reputable sources of information.

But if that wasn't the point of the post by OP, we're all good here.

I think we're all on the same side, looking at it from all angles. 🤷‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Nobody said it was, and is irrelevant. I will quote my other reply to explain the intended point:

If the only media reporting about a new technology is a video then that thing is significantly more likely to be bullshit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, not the point, like the other person said.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

What he goes into has nothing to do with anything. You don't seem to understand my comment, it's very possible that i worded it poorly, so I'll reiterate:

If the only media reporting about a new technology is a video then that thing is significantly more likely to be bullshit

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Don't worry, you have at least one person who understands what you mean. I definitely agree. 👍 If there's no written coverage, the significance seems low/only for clout.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, because it's a maker on YouTube showing off a project he did? It's a clickbaity title sure, but this isn't a research paper showcasing a new technology. He's using a dev kit to make something he thinks is cool. Fail to see the issue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

because it's a maker on YouTube showing off a project he did?

No.

Fail to see the issue.

We're not getting through properly—there is no issue. It's all in the hypothetical purpose of the post by OP.

If this was a way to announce a widely available thing, it would be more credible as an article than a YouTube video. That's all.

But this is fine as it is. I don't think that was the purpose of the video or post. I think it was just a fun video. 👍

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thanks, it's weird how some people are reacting to this comment. Is this their first day on the Internet? I'm not saying this device IS bullshit, I'm saying from a long history of experience that if the only 3rd party media you can find about a device is a video then that device is significantly more likely to be bullshit. It's simple and clearly true.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yes. People are still down voting us. I think it's hard to explain this concept or something. We're not getting through. Oh well.