Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
Wireless power sounds like and RFI nightmare. It will never match the efficiency of a cable either.
I doubt anyone is under the impression that it is going to be as efficient as direct power. At least no one paying attention.
Edit: The downvotes lead me to believe a not insignificant number of people don’t understand how energy works.
Downvotes be damned: you’re right, imo. A wire just has less to worry about, and I’m sure most people would think the same. Most people.
You're also skipping two energy conversions by keeping it in the wire
Efficiency and outright performance isn't always a priority.
A lan cable outperforms a wireless Internet connection in every way, yet most people just use WiFi
I was actually surprised the Bluetooth keyboard and mouse still worked.
This method uses magnetic resonant coupling (vs inductive which is how wireless charging works on your phone). The difference is the transmitter and receiver are both tuned LC circuits that operate at their resonant frequency, which is why this works over the impressive range shown in the video. It would have efficiencies around 80% mark based on what I could find. But yeah for RFI, this would definitely be worse than something like normal Qi charging, which operates in the 100s of KHz, while this operates in the MHz. But I think the manufacturers page says this is FCC certified? So might be not too bad.
This better be electroboom
It's not - this dude doesn't zap himself even once.
It's a good video though, showing how he integrated everything.
Why is this a video and not an article? Makes me think it's just bullshit
Why would a YouTube channel make an article instead of, you know, making a video, which is their job?
What their job is has nothing to do with my statement. If the only media reporting about a new technology is a video then that thing is significantly more likely to be bullshit
It's not reporting on a technology. DIYPerks is a channel about cool projects he does. He shows the build process and explains everything and usually provides plans to follow along
He goes into the downsides of the technology, which you would've known if you had watched it. He's also a very well known, and reputable channel, so I don't see any reason to not trust him.
If you want more than just a video about an emerging tech then why don't you provide an article on it, instead of expecting it from OP, who probably just wanted to post a cool tech video.
Not the point. The point is that if this is an attempt at reporting cool new tech usable by the masses, then it should be posted as written coverage. YouTube videos can easily be perceived as content churn rather than reputable sources of information.
But if that wasn't the point of the post by OP, we're all good here.
I think we're all on the same side, looking at it from all angles. 🤷♂️
It's a YouTube channel that does high quality DIY projects, and explains the reasons behind the choices made.
Why would this be an article as opposed to, y'know, a video? His job is to make YouTube videos.
I don't understand this obsession some on Lemmy have with shitting on hard-working creative types when they make something in video form rather than creating a blog and publishing articles.
It's an interesting video, you can see the sizes and form factor of the recievers this way much better. You can still skip the parts you are not interested in.
The quick start guide from the link in the description if you just want to read numbers: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/669856991b982007b8a6a788/t/67af70bd5fc318472e2f9f1a/1739550910959/Evaluation+Kit+-+Quick+Start+Guide.pdf
Did you even watch the video? It's a well-produced piece of content from a pretty well-known individual
Because it is bullshit lol.
Wireless efficiency is around 70%-75% max with something like that; EMF and RMF issues abound in any configuration without shielding, which this one has none of. I am surprised anything works.
I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm not willing to pay a 30% higher electrical bill for something like this.
It wouldn't be a 30% higher electrical bill overall. It would be 30% more for whatever power you're using for this specific device, which, if it's ordinarily 10W while in sleep and an average 100W while in use, and you use it 50 hours per week, or 215 hours per month, that's a baseline power usage of 21500 watt hours in use and 5050 watt hours from idle/sleep/suspend. Or a total of 26550 watt hours, or 26.5 kWh. At 20 cents per kWh, you're talking about $5.30 per month in electricity for the computer. A 30% increase would be an extra $1.60 per month.
Nice, enjoy your wireless nightmare.
Once I had a wireless Corsair Keyboard which sometimes received input from someone else's keyboard (it typed entire sentences on my PC). Corsair said this was impossible, yet somehow words appeared on my screen while only my keyboard was linked. A neighbor logged in to something using his email address and password and it appeared into my word document. Like, wtf!
So I love my wires. I have no wifi, no wireless devices (except for my phone and game controllers) and I have no interference issues with anything (and I have a music studio in my living room with loads of synths).
Just do some proper cable management. It's really fun to do and gives a clean look.
Wireless peripherals and any wireless data transfer protocols are completely irrelevant to the content of this video, which is centred around wireless power transfer.
Also wireless peripherals are pretty great, not sure what you're on about.
Corsair
I believe I found the problem.
Do you remember the exact model? I'm interested in looking into it
Took some digging in my mailbox, but I found it: the Corsair K57 RGB wireless qwerty keyboard.
Hell yeah, some DIY Perks on lemmy.
Great quality video as always, even though the setup might be cumbersome to add peripherals in the long term.
But still interesting !
What I'd like to know here is if this setup is continuously drawing maximum power or if the power usage only goes up when a device is within the magnetic grid.
it does say on the site for the device that it draws 100W, but in the video he says that there is a 10W minimum draw, so i'm assuming it goes up from there
We coulda had an entirely wireless energy grid back in Tesla's day if it wasn't for capitalists who didn't see a way to profit from it.
it also would have very publically been a huge failure. Tesla tended to ignore the science when he didn't like it. It could not have possibly worked
Pretty sure I saw a movie where ol' Nick Tesla cloned Wolverine a bunch of times to fight Batman. If he was able to make clones back in the day I'm sure he could figure out a power grid issue.
-
+ Wireless
-
- limited range
-
- horribly inefficient, increasing with distance
So, there.
tesla's idea was global wireless power. no idea what his efficiency numbers were though.
Are you somehow under the impression that just because it is "global" there are no transmitters and receivers and distance does not matter?
We, today, understand how to power something wirelessly. The problem is it's horribly inefficient.
No, they saw a way of profiting from it not happening..
Can I buy this yet
Its r&d kits only but send em an email and they will probably sell u one
Would seem offly click baity of them to say "it's finally here" if you couldn't...
LTT be like....
Math, since it has a 10 watt minimum power draw, that would mean it would use 7.5 kilowatts per month just to have it turned on. Now at least where I live, that's $1.11 extra.