this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
82 points (100.0% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1274 readers
499 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/31072292

Summary:

I downvoted pro-AI comments in a post in leftymemes community. It was LLM generated polandball comic (Which is objectively pathetic as fuck) that showed up on my feed, blocked couple of users who I thought were unhinged, and have blocked the whole instance on my client after realizing how rabid these morons are.

I didn't go looking for AI posts like a vigilante.

One user in question got miffed for being downvoted and banned me from places they moderate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe don't assume all people who support or are interested in a certain thing are the exact same people would be a nice start.

I often wonder about antiAI opinions such as "it isn't making art" what differentiates art to you? When it genuinely does create things that are not already in existence, how do you square that circle?

When people say LLMs are just fancy autocomplete, and I ask it to check an entire nodered flow for logic issues and it points out valid and interesting things I overlooked when designing it, how exactly do you determine that's autocomplete? Because I've used autocomplete or intellisense or whatever and this is leaps and bounds beyond those capabilities.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I said 'i find im wrong sometimes'

But this reads like 'not all men' so im gonna spare myself the rest of your comment.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm attempting good faith discussion on something I find interesting, but you do you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I told you how arguing about this with enthusiasts who don't know what the fuck they're talking about has effected me, and you're still trying to tell me how your cool toy is actually magic tho.

You're "not all men"ing me about my problem with people who "not all men" about their fucking favorite toy. Not even the first in this thread to do it.

That's like three layers of the oblivious piece of shit version of, like, reverse FLN recursion; a kind of active anti-consciousness.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

You claim this is about how the technology is defended, and we both gave you pretty good arguments, i didn't see any from you yet except neboluos accusations and a pretty uncalled for "not all men" quip. I was hoping for civil discourse here and that you can see that not everyone who uses this technology is a accelerationist crypto tech bro, and i only see one person here behaving like the thing you want to criticize - not open to arguments, passive-aggressive, resorting to ad hominem.

Maybe don't talk to people who don't know what the fuck they are talking about if they trigger you so much, but for sure don't use the same measure if you are talking with people who know what the fuck they are talking about, that doesn't suit you.

Read the thread again. Take a good look in the mirror. Your behavior here is out of line, and you know it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm not I just want you to actually explain your position instead of hand waiving away large swaths of people as idiots, but if you're just going to grandstand I don't really see a point and we should just stop here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't owe you shit though.

If you're actually curious, and don't just want to harass me about it, there are ways you could find out without bugging me, which i said in pretty strong terms i dont love to discuss. Simple, easy ways. Really really strong terms.

But this isn't even about the technology itself. This is about the scum who defend it. Its the 'rick and morty' of computers.

This is about you, and your recursive piece-of-shit-ness.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

There's 2 people here but only one behaving like scum.