452
this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
452 points (100.0% liked)
politics
24229 readers
2732 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Because BNMW amirite?
I really enjoy that you have to put this in code now. Can't openly state it. And still get largely downvoted for it.
It's such a shitty, dishonest take. And people are finally waking up to it. Hindsight has always been 2020. And looking back I think plenty of people right now sorely wish we still had a Democrat in the oval office. Regardless of all the problems that we would still have. We wouldn't have a full-on autocrat on the March in our own country as well. And might actually be able to focus completely on what's going on over in Palestine instead of having to split our resources now on more fronts. Including local.
I'm not defending Or absolving democrats of their part in this. They're still not learning. Just like you're still not learning. And just as much as the Democrats are not an ally of the left or the people in general. Neither is someone like you who actively campaigned against our best interest. Helping to get the worst possible outcome elected. Simply because the other option was not perfect enough.
No yours is the dishonest take. You're defending the rot at the core of the Democratic party, when it's that very rot that prevents them from an easy path to victory in elections, and speeds our progress towards fascism.
MLK was right when he said that the true enemy of progress in this world were those who would ask us to suffer an unjust peace instead of accepting the righteous tension required to bring about change.
We're here because we were told, by people like you, that we needed to accept less from Democrats because the alternative was worse. And we listened, for decades. And as a result both Democrats and their alternative both got worse, to the point that The Democratic party is at its lowest favor ability in almost a hundred years.
So miss me with your anemic, shown to be losing, approach to politics
I'm not defending the rot. I literally called you and them both out. But you've never been honest so why would you start now. We could do a lot more to take care of it if there was a democrat in office right now and we weren't having to struggle to keep Ukraine from being steamrolled and our allies betrayed domestic and foreign. All the families now being ripped apart. Simply because Biden was not good enough for you simply because Harris was not good enough for you. You and your useless Purity tests.
Oh and nice selective quoting of Martin Luther King Jr. there. Don't let yourself think that slipped by. But I'll tell you one thing. While King was correct to call that out. You know what he didn't do. He didn't stop trying to seek alliances where he could to change things when possible. Martin Luther King Jr didn't rely on Purity tests. Not like you. People are right to have a lot of regret. Things weren't perfect. But they were better. And hopefully they will learn from all this purity testing. But letting the perfect be the enemy of the achievable is always a bad position.
I've never told anyone to accept less from the democrats. In fact I regularly tell people to primary them everywhere and Republicans as well. The simple fact is when it comes to national elections like the presidency. It will either be a Republican or a Democrat that wins. And while neither one is good. One is certainly much much worse. As shameful as it was. Palestine wasn't on the ballot in the presidential election. But blatant fascism was. And while Democrats I think did the Lions share to hurt themselves. People with purity test like yours did no service either.
But you do you. Tell yourself what you need to to absolve yourself of any role in the problems we're now facing in america. Build as many straw men as you like. People see you. And they're not liking what they see.
Purity tests?! THEY WERE SUPPORTING A GENOCIDE! American liberals have lost their absolute minds.
And so we're republicans. The genocide in Palestine literally was not on the ballot. No matter who won it was going to continue.
The only thing that was on the ballot was whether we were going to bring the genocide home and make it worse or not. Spoiler.
Now not only are we not having the minimal to no pushback against Israel that we had before. We have Trump actively enabling Israel and pushing to go to war in Iran. The worst possible option. And the Democrats definitely did plenty to bring it on themselves. But a lot of people were manipulated into turning the genocide in Palestine into an attack issue specifically against democrats. So effectively. That a number of Palestinians voted for Trump thinking he would be better about Palestine.
A system where literal genocide "is not on the ballot" is a wholly irredeemable system. Please understand that democrats are as responsible for Trumpism as republicans. Oh how people miss Obama, yet even with two terms in office, he failed to make any fundamental changes that could have prevented Trump. Democrats pose no credible opposition to republicans, because they are fundamentally incapable (unwilling) to address the problems we are facing. Basically the same foreign policy, and halfhearted reformist approaches to domestic issues. Republicans have all the wrong answers, but people see them fighting to implement them.
I never said it was. Why would you even think that that's what I was implying? Acknowledging reality is not endorsing it.
During the presidential election we had the choice to either hold our ground or make things worse. Between the Democrats Optical and rhetorical failures. Plenty were also more concerned with virtue signaling to attack them. Rather than do what was achievable. Hoisting that turd over the Finish Line just to spite the fascist and keep them from Power.
Trust me as an anarchist I want to see every National level politician out of the job. And most in the state as well. It's got nothing to do with supporting them. Just acknowledging the reality of the situation.
The democrats are one of the two "legs" that have been marching us to where we are today. It is better that people stop thinking they will protect us in any way from fascism, when they have been merrily helping to implement it. I get that you still feel it's worth engaging with them as a political party even though you may find them abhorrent. The dem base in the other hand, loves them. Nothing better than the status quo, no matter how bad that gets!
Okay, and? Where did I ever give the impression that I had any sort of respect or confidence in them to think that they could protect anyone, even themselves. Was it that confidence inspiring phrase of hoisting another turd of a campaign over the Finish Line just to block the fascist?
Yes, they and Republicans both helped to march us to this cliff. How does jumping off the cliff help us? How did it help anyone.
It's seriously not worth engaging with them as a party. We need to take power back from the national parties at local levels across the country. But their dead weight can still be useful. Even if it's just inertia to slow a slide into complete collapse.
You're relitigating the past. You might as well blame dem voters rather than others if you're going to do that. We are in year one of Trump's term. We should all be going full blast on how complicit the democrats are with all of this shit. We should all be shouting at dems how fucking garbage we think their policies are, and how we won't be wasting our time voting for them. We should be clear about what we want, and what we won't accept. And all that is only really for people that have any hope for that party.
Why? Everyone knows Democrats are shit. How is continuing to attack them going to achieve anything? We need to be the ones to actually offer something better and viable more broadly.
If you're still engaging with them politically, it seems like you should be attacking them in order to force them to take popular positions. If you're just going to vote blue no matter who, then you have zero political influence.
And would you say that situation has gotten better, or worse under the new administration?
You aren't just defending the rot: you are the rot. And calling me dishonest when you've been in a state of perpetual gaslight for litterally years?
Fucking rich dude.
Litterally all I have done is that advocate that Democrats not use strategies shown to lose elections. Your brain interprets that as advocating against Democrats, and I'm sorry that I can't take a time machine back to your 10th grade home home room teacher that Eldritch the apologist needs to work on their reading comprehension skills. Show me once, where I advocated for people to not vote Democrat in the 2024 election.
Your persistent and nefarious approach to politics, your constant efforts to silence important accurate and relevant criticism of Democrats, advocacy that is trying to get them to do better: Your the fucking problem with the Democrats.
Shielding Biden from criticism during an election cycle threw the election for Democrats. Shielding Harris from criticism when she didn't shift policies from Biden lost the election for Democrats.
Gaslighting people to deny the evidence of their eyes and ears will continue to lose Democrats elections.
Democrats can't win elections using your approach. We ran the experiment. We have the data. You were the fucking problem.
Genocide apologia.
You heard it here! Genocide is "good".
Clearly not, because the Democrats policy on Palestine was blatant fascism
Your boos mean nothing, we've seen what makes you cheer
“Not perfect enough” is such a stupid way to phrase that.
You had that chance for over a year, you spent my defending Bidens participation in genocide
Imagine describing "active participation in a modern Holocaust" as "not perfect enough"