this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
603 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

8421 readers
1280 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I don't think any action against the IDF or Israel is Antisemitic in any way, shape, or form.

I also see "death to the IDF" as a statement advocating the death of the entire adult population of Israel, and we have a word for that which rhymes with engocide.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

oh sorry, let's just politely ask the murderers to stop murdering for the 100th time today, maybe this time it will work!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Lets just do this: kill or put on trial netanyahu and any active combatants.

Just as important, establish a new rule of law in the region which will respect the value of human life and fairly dispute land claims.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How does "death to the IDF" mean death to the entire adult population? Regardless of mandatory service in the past, they aren't in the IDF now, and they aren't the ones "just following orders." I also don't think Bob Vylan is actually suggesting that every person in the IDF be killed, regardless of complicity, but calling for the downfall of the organization perpetuating genocide.

"Death to ICE" doesn't mean the same thing as "kill all ICE agents."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

So you're making the additional distinction of only people who currently actively serve in the IDF and not any previous members?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Missing the point. "Death to [organization]" is not synonymous with "kill all members of [organization]." Even if it did, my other point is that the entire country is not in the IDF. You've made claims and extrapolations that have nothing to do with anyone's actual beliefs. It wouldn't be genocide regardless.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Listen, too many in this world acts like it's impossible not to make problematic statements about the mass death or exodus of others. I do not have that problem that they seem to find unavoidable. Death to every [blank] is pretty much always a bad statement to make.

Just don't say those things and you will never be misunderstood.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You continue to change the narrative. The did not say "Death to every [blank]." You said that. They said "death to the IDF." If I say "death to capitalism," I'm not saying "kill all capitalists." They're calling for the downfall of an evil organization. You are choosing to misunderstand them and put words in their mouth. You keep walking back your initial exaggeration. They clearly do not mean kill all Israeli adults. This is the same willful misinterpretation that the rest of the neoliberal media does.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you say Death to Capitalism I also think you're a fucking psycho in that context, too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

It was a hypothetical. Pretending those two statements are the same is willful ignorance. You're continuing to pearl-clutch over a statement that doesn't mean what you're claiming it does. You're putting words and intent I people's mouths and then making moral judgements based off your misinformation. You're making ad hominem attacks against a hypothetical. How are you still trying to justify an untenable position?