this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
825 points (100.0% liked)

News

30773 readers
2249 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Senate has passed a bill making Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) the U.S.'s largest interior law enforcement agency with funding for Donald Trump's immigration enforcement agenda higher than most of the world's militaries, including Israel's.

Pending its passage in the House of Representatives, Trump's bill could mean a massive increase in ICE funding as part of an immigration enforcement agenda worth $150 billion over four years.

This figure is more than the annual military budget of Italy, which at $30.8 billion, is the world's 16th highest defense spender for this year according to tracker Global Fire Power.

It is also higher than military spending for Israel, ($30 billion), the Netherlands ($27 billion) and Brazil ($26.1 billion).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 72 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Is anyone still pretending ICE is about immigration? ICE is Trump's SS, and they just got funding beyond any dictator's wildest dreams. Good luck with your totalitarian police state.

Edit: I want to retract my last sentence. It was callous and stupid. My heart aches for the people who fought against this.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Don't worry, the gun nuts will stand up against the totalitarian regime.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The real problem will likely end up being that civilians can't own the firepower the US military/police have, legally. No full auto, no giant drums, no grenades, no missiles, no fighter jets. Even if it were a "well-regulated militia" one fighter/bomber could take them all out, and be marketed on some made up news articles as, "we stopped the terrorists, you're safe now."

If it really came down to it, such a battle would be very one-sided, so it would have to be more strategic guerilla tactics.

Oh, and the SS just got a huge budget increase, so that won't help. (As seen above.)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Its probably time we all become the gun nuts at least while they still let us

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There were already talks in the p2025 circles about ceasing civilian firearms in some fashion and then allowing "permits" at some future time for "loyal" gun owners. Wouldn't be surprised if they'll still try it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Actually really curious as to the exact wording of this.

Because I wonder if this one in particular were better publicized, if it would turn some percentage of hardcore single-issue 2A types against the regime, if they put their money where their (very loud) mouths are.

It seems like it wouldn't work, but I imagine if we can broadcast a lot of "Are you STILL so sure they're not the bad guys?!" messages with receipts, it could eventually change some minds.

Even if they want to get back to arguing with us over the dinner table when the dust settles, we need everyone we can get.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm going to neg on my own comment, I don't trust Snopes anymore, but many news services also discredited what I mentioned. So at this point, because we know their reality is mutable and transient, who knows if it really happened or not. I'd still bank on yes, but I have no actual evidence to back it up.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-roger-stone-guns-memo/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Your integrity and commitment to transparency and truth is most honorable and appreciated.

Thank you for the update and for being a shining example the rest of us should follow. Stay safe out there. <3

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

The left need to arm themselves asap

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That's how it was supposed to be, until the Right co-opted firearms as an entire personality, and the liberal response was to spread ignorance, miseducation, and fear about them so that their party branding looked different enough.

So now all the insecure, hateful, scared-of-everybody violence-fantasists are armed, knowledgeable, and stocked.

And those that would oppose authoritarianism en masse were force-fed "Only cops and the military should be armed and the rest of us should just wish they didn't exist".

So they're now largely rendered toothless and clawless normies who think flash hiders, rail grips, and black paint make a weapon "more lethal." And don't know what to do with themselves if pickets and law systems don't have an effect.

Meanwhile the "patriotic" bullies ramble about "freedom" and "small government" whilst simping for their fascist overlords unopposed by any actual threat.

Like most loud bullies, most are the types that would likely break if met with any actual opposition that could do them harm.

I don't want to see it come to this, but we need to educate and train ourselves before it's too late. The threat alone might be enough to put them in their place.

It's very clear nobody is coming to save us from this worsening state of affairs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Any moment now 🫠