this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
210 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3962 readers
278 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fedegenerate 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Ironic statement given the post. Speech has been banned, all that's left to do is quibble about what speech.

Should speech supporting genocide be banned, or should speech protesting genocide be banned?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe neither should be banned? Also I'm not "supporting genocide", I just look at the casualty numbers and they're consistent with a war, not a genocide. The word "genocide" has been weaponized and that's rationalizing the use of violence which doesn't help anyone.

These "Palestine Action" idiots are not helping Palestinians in any way. They're narcissists doing vandalism to increase their standing within a internet small bubble. That's all they're doing.

You're reading words I've written, that's speech but apparently some people around here think that should be banned. Do you think words should be banned and vandalism by narcissists should be legal?

[–] Fedegenerate 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

It was just interesting, that in a post about people's speech being banned with legal consequences (14 years in prison) your first comment wasn't to protest that. But in a comment threatening speech with social consequences (a ban from a social media site) you were right in on protesting that.

Once again, violence is already happening. All we can do now is quibble about who that violence is directed at.

Would you prefer violence against Palestinian civilians, or some property?

Summary:

Speech is already being banned. Do you think supporting/ denying the genocide should be banned? Or acknowledging/protesting the genocide should be banned?

Violence is already happening. Do you support the violence against Palestinian civilians. Or the violence against some planes.

To answer your question, given the choice between a world with more vandalism or a world with more genocide: I'd take the world with more vandalism.