this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
1603 points (100.0% liked)
Political Memes
8806 readers
2612 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No, he wouldn't. But Trump has very much made their previous horrible conditions worse.
But the increased level of Palestinian deaths doesn't matter - you have to justify your decision to enable the murder of Palestinians to yourself by any means necessary. After all, otherwise you might feel bad, and that's worse than any number of dead Palestinians.
My goal is to emphasize that murdering more people out of some pathetic sense of self-righteousness is, itself, fucking murderous, and that what is peddled as moral purity is literally enabling genocide and fascism out of a petty and bizarre sense of self-aggrandizement.
The fucking fact of the matter is, the 2024 election is over. There is no 'redo'. Millions of Palestinians are going to die, and a significant percentage of them are going to die directly because of the increased level of support given to Israel by Trump.
My goal in pointing this out is the slim, slim chance that maybe one person who sees this, too used to getting asspatted for enabling genocide, might be shaken enough by it being pointed out that they effectively enabled the literal fucking Nazis by inaction to not let delusions of moral purity let the literal fucking Nazis win the next time an issue like this comes up.
Fuck's sake. Imagine if there's a fucking civil war in this country and purists decide they'd rather let the Nazis win than work with the dreaded shitlibs. There are, unfortunately, ample examples of just that happening during civil wars.
But hey, let's cultivate the attitude of "If there are only two, unequally bad choices available, rather than choose the less bad option, choose the worse one out of spite!", what the fuck could go wrong, eh?
I care about the Palestinian people. Unfortunately, the last chance we Americans had to make a serious difference in how many of them were going to die going forward was in November 2024, and we, the American people, said, as a supermajority, that we either didn't care if more died going forward, or that we supported it. A minority of around 1/3 of us said we would like Palestinian murder to not escalate.
There is no 'pulling people to my side' for Palestine at this point. I can (and do) donate to humanitarian orgs and point out that Israel is committing genocide, but my strongest period of influence is over, and failed.
All I can do is try to remind people of the fucking horror of enabling more Palestinian deaths because you didn't get your way in the hopes that the next time a crisis like this happens people might take the less-bad option instead of the worse one.
Well I voted for Kamala if that makes anyone feel better. It's just that I've been following the plight of the Palestinians for far longer than it's been popular and I've been forced to watch as every single US president has stood at a podium and pledge fealty to Isreal without exception. Joe Biden delayed a single weapons shipment to Isreal one time and it was only delayed by a week. There have been reports that the delay was logistical and the Biden statement was just a political move that simply took political advantage of the delay. Either way, the status quo will guarantee death to the people who need our help the most. I understated what you're saying when you state Trump is accelerating the destruction. I also understand that the approach to minimize the damage by voting the lesser of two evils will also lead to democracy sliding into fascism. How many times can you ask someone to vote the lesser of two evils when every cycle they find they still only have two evils from witch to choose?
I've been the vote blue guy and at this point it's hard to ignore that voting evils (even if lesser) still continues our slide into evil. Break the system, fix the system or change the system but vote blue no matter who only >SOMETIMES< delays death but it doesn't ever stop it. Maybe you're young enough where you haven't done the same thing over and over but I'm telling you, it never actually changes anything. At least, not for those without power in the middle east.
Ps. It's not me down voting you.
That's the whole point of the term 'harm reduction' though. It's not saying voting for Dem ghouls will fix our problems - it's explicitly saying harm will continue with our votes. The point is that harm reduction reduces the ongoing damage while we try other methods to right this fucked situation.
Whatever else we do 364 days a year, having fewer people being murdered while we do it is worth 1 day of casting a vote.