this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
1326 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

8779 readers
3367 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExhibiCat 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

The problem here is having only two choices.

Where I'm from we have coalition governments. It's very rare for one party to have a majority. So they have to argue for months and come to some kind of agreement with other parties. The good thing is that everyone can vote for what they really want. There's not really any 'lost votes'. The bad thing is that the coalition forming process is messy and slow and the result is much watered down. But I'd much rather have this than a two party system.

If I had been a US citizen I'd have voted for Harris though.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago

The problem here is having only two choices.

Yeah, our system is fucked. Unfortunately, we play with the cards we have, not the cards we want.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I'm sorry but this is an old tactic in my country. 2 major parties always fighting for power, and the one always ask to vote them because the other party will destroy the country.

And the blame goes to the no voters or the ice-cream voters or the voters that turn their back, not to the party itself or to their voters that did shit when they were in power for many years. Maybe its time to pay attention to what caused the problem and not to the result.

As for the USA, Trump is the outcome of the Democrats acting as Republicans for decades.

Edit: Last sentence is a bit oversimplification of the story, but Democrats had abandoned the working class and the low income people. They acted like moderate Republicans, especially in the economy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

As for the USA, Trump is the outcome of the Democrats acting as Republicans for decades.

Jesus fucking Christ, it's like no one has any memory of what Dem positions actually were for fucking decades - or Republican positions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I hear minimum wage is the same as it was in 2010. Also big companies pay less taxes than small business or not at all. Military budget goes up every year. Healthcare is a joke for the richest country of the world. etc..

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Do you know Dem positions on any of those?

Dems have ran on an increased minimum wage ever since Bernie burst onto the scene. But we elected Republicans instead. Dems have been running on corporate tax increases since 2012. But we elect Republicans. Obama had a knock-down drag-out multi-year fight reducing the military budget. But we elected Republicans, and that was reversed. Healthcare is a joke, and expansion of healthcare has been a platform of the Dems since 2016, with even that ghoul Hillary running on healthcare expansion. But we elect Republicans. The only time we've controlled all three houses in the past fifteen fucking years was a period of two years, 2020-2022, with a 'majority' of 50-50 in the Senate.

Dems are insufficient. But this delusion that both sides are the same is utterly ruinous purity politics bullshit that has directly led to the death of millions.

But hey, at least you didn't have to hold hands with the dreaded shitlibs. Any amount of murdered minorities is worth that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 47 minutes ago (1 children)

Minimum wage: Dems ran on $15 since 2015. Reality? In 2021, 8 Senate Dems killed it. “$11 is more reasonable”, Result: 20 states still at $7.25.

Corporate taxes: Biden’s 2022 “win” (15% min tax) affects 150 companies. Meanwhile, Amazon paid 0% in 2021. Dems folded on closing offshore loopholes.

Military spending: Obama’s “cuts” were a theater. He ended ground wars but quadrupled drone strikes (civilian deaths went up 400%). Biden signs $886B budget, higher than Trump did.

Healthcare: 2009: Dems had 60 votes. They gutted the public option to please Big Pharma donors.

Dems had 4 months at 60 seats in 2009 and 18 days at 50+VP in 2021. Both times, they negotiated against themselves.

Harm reduction in a burning building is not a permanent solution.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 34 minutes ago (1 children)

Minimum wage: Dems ran on $15 since 2015. Reality? In 2021, 8 Senate Dems killed it. “$11 is more reasonable”, Result: 20 states still at $7.25.

Corporate taxes: Biden’s 2022 “win” (15% min tax) affects 150 companies. Meanwhile, Amazon paid 0% in 2021. Dems folded on closing offshore loopholes.

And that has to do with the national party line... in what way?

Military spending: Obama’s “cuts” were a theater. He ended ground wars but quadrupled drone strikes (civilian deaths went up 400%).

  1. Saying that "cuts" were a theatre by pointing to drone strikes makes no sense. Budget cuts are fucking budget cuts, I'm sorry that you don't think that wasting less money on implements of war instead of human needs is a good thing?

  2. Civilian deaths did not go up "400%".

  3. Drone strikes went up as a replacement for traditional air and artillery strikes, not as a sudden spike in military activity.

Biden signs $886B budget, higher than Trump did.

Much of the increase was a pay raise for troops and assistance to Ukraine; furthermore, the increases of the Biden years were significantly lower, by percentage, than during the Trump years. But sure, both sides same. What's Trump's position on Ukraine, again?

Healthcare: 2009: Dems had 60 votes. They gutted the public option to please Big Pharma donors.

Yes, and the Blue Dogs were massacred in 2010 and 2012 because of this.

Dems had 4 months at 60 seats in 2009

And as anyone who actually follows politics can tell you, four months is a blink of a fucking eye, and the fragility of that fillibuster-proof majority was exactly why ramming the legislature through was so important.

and 18 days at 50+VP in 2021. Both times, they negotiated against themselves.

I'm sorry, do you think the Democratic Party is a hivemind? It's a big-tent coalition in a situation where they literally could not lose even a single vote to pass any legislature?

What exactly were you expecting from a razor-thin margin in a big-tent "Everyone who isn't the fascist ghouls" coalition? Socialism in a five year plan?

Harm reduction in a burning building is not a permanent solution.

YES, THAT'S THE POINT OF HARM REDUCTION

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 minutes ago* (last edited 20 minutes ago)

YES, THAT’S THE POINT OF HARM REDUCTION

You are not getting it, are you?

Suppose the Dems won with the Harm Reduction policy. What do you think would happen after 4 years? Trumpism would surrender? Fascist would say, ah we lost lets give up?

No, you are in a permanent state, where Dems making only the bare minimum, people voting them out of fear, for what? Forever? You call that a solution? Because that already may happened. Maybe Biden elected as a harm reduction. But this aint go forever.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

If you want my vote then stop telling me leftists can't win. If the lesser of two evils is the best we can hope for then I'll vote for the cliff with rusted spikes at the bottom. You can attack me over that view but all that will buy you is a self righteous feeling as our bus plunges over the edge.

PS. I've reliably voted the lesser of two evils for as long as I can remember and the outcome is that it always gets worse. A slow swing towards a totalitarian society just makes people feel like everything is normal. Especially to younger people who have never seen a better life for average Americans and don't realize were sliding until its too late. Chuck Shumer isn't going to stop our slide but like the Trump BBB he may fight to change the name.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 minutes ago

Lol, the "self righteous" accusation here is unbelievable.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

If you want my vote then stop telling me leftists can’t win. If the lesser of two evils is the best we can hope for then I’ll vote for the cliff with rusted spikes at the bottom. You can attack me over that view but all that will buy you is a self righteous feeling as our bus plunges over the edge.

"If leftists can't win, Palestinians must die."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah because the Democrats are so Pro Palestinian 🙄

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Yeah because the Democrats are so Pro Palestinian 🙄

Do you admit that, in principle, putting aside the issue of the Dem position on Palestine which we will discuss immediately after this, giving support to the genocide of Palestinians because you were told that "leftists can't win" is not only immensely juvenile, but outright murderous and ghoulish?

EDIT: Don't bother responding, as you've pointed out elsewhere that you're a pro-genocide fascist who believes that Ukrainians should submit to Russian genocide, we have nothing to talk about. I don't debate with Nazis.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's the self righteous feeling I was talking about. I hate to tell you this but centrist Democrats were never going to stop Benjamin Netanyahu. I'm half convinced this argument is put out by right wing trolls considering how ridiculous it is. The only real difference would be a possible statement saying they should slow down the killing. Palestinians have been pushed into smaller and smaller spaces throughout isreals existence. Israeli settlers have violently and continuously pushed Palestinians out of their own homes. When has the US actually used its influence to stop Isreal? I've seen statements made but considering Isreal absolutely needs the US its odd that no US president from either party has ever tried to stop this. In fact, the only thing I've ever heard from any president ever is their declaration of their unwavering support for Isreal.

So no, your silly position is what put Palestinians in the position they're in, not mine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I hate to tell you this but centrist Democrats were never going to stop Benjamin Netanyahu.

Luckily, Republicans are more than happy to expand the genocide to the West Bank! Critical support for Palestinian genocide! After all, if the Dems aren't going to solve the problem, why shouldn't good, upstanding leftists like you vote for Palestinian deaths out of spite?

When has the US actually used its influence to stop Isreal? I’ve seen statements made but considering Isreal absolutely needs the US its odd that no US president from either party has ever tried to stop this.

1956, 1973, 1993

It is funny how loudly people who are against American interventionism suddenly become advocates for America: World Police, though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Luckily, Republicans are more than happy to expand the genocide to the West Bank! Critical support for Palestinian genocide! After all, if the Dems aren't going to solve the problem, why shouldn't good, upstanding leftists like you vote for Palestinian deaths out of spite?

You've got to be a right wing troll. I'll say it one more time, I very much support saving the Palestinian people but I don't believe for one second that Chuck Shumer would do anything about their current horrible conditions.

I've got to ask, what is your goal in attacking my position? Are you trying to change my mind? Are you trying to convince others to take your position? If yes to either, how effective do you believe your strategy has been? If you really care about the Palestinians then why not try to pull people to your side rather than doing the equivalent to a "thoughts and prayers" post that won't change anyone's mind?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

You’ve got to be a right wing troll. I’ll say it one more time, I very much support saving the Palestinian people but I don’t believe for one second that Chuck Shumer would do anything about their current horrible conditions.

No, he wouldn't. But Trump has very much made their previous horrible conditions worse.

But the increased level of Palestinian deaths doesn't matter - you have to justify your decision to enable the murder of Palestinians to yourself by any means necessary. After all, otherwise you might feel bad, and that's worse than any number of dead Palestinians.

I’ve got to ask, what is your goal in attacking my position? Are you trying to change my mind? Are you trying to convince others to take your position? If yes to either, how effective do you believe your strategy has been?

My goal is to emphasize that murdering more people out of some pathetic sense of self-righteousness is, itself, fucking murderous, and that what is peddled as moral purity is literally enabling genocide and fascism out of a petty and bizarre sense of self-aggrandizement.

The fucking fact of the matter is, the 2024 election is over. There is no 'redo'. Millions of Palestinians are going to die, and a significant percentage of them are going to die directly because of the increased level of support given to Israel by Trump.

My goal in pointing this out is the slim, slim chance that maybe one person who sees this, too used to getting asspatted for enabling genocide, might be shaken enough by it being pointed out that they effectively enabled the literal fucking Nazis by inaction to not let delusions of moral purity let the literal fucking Nazis win the next time an issue like this comes up.

Fuck's sake. Imagine if there's a fucking civil war in this country and purists decide they'd rather let the Nazis win than work with the dreaded shitlibs. There are, unfortunately, ample examples of just that happening during civil wars.

But hey, let's cultivate the attitude of "If there are only two, unequally bad choices available, rather than choose the less bad option, choose the worse one out of spite!", what the fuck could go wrong, eh?

If you really care about the Palestinians then why not try to pull people to your side rather than doing the equivalent to a “thoughts and prayers” post that won’t change anyone’s mind?

I care about the Palestinian people. Unfortunately, the last chance we Americans had to make a serious difference in how many of them were going to die going forward was in November 2024, and we, the American people, said, as a supermajority, that we either didn't care if more died going forward, or that we supported it. A minority of around 1/3 of us said we would like Palestinian murder to not escalate.

There is no 'pulling people to my side' for Palestine at this point. I can (and do) donate to humanitarian orgs and point out that Israel is committing genocide, but my strongest period of influence is over, and failed.

All I can do is try to remind people of the fucking horror of enabling more Palestinian deaths because you didn't get your way in the hopes that the next time a crisis like this happens people might take the less-bad option instead of the worse one.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

"I voted for the cliff because I know the ice cream place is down below it and I wanted to get there faster." - Have to assume this person exists, but I'm not sure who they would be in the analogy. 🤔

Edit: Oh, I just had to scroll down a few more comments to find them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

A vote is not an endorsement, it's a move.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›