this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
549 points (100.0% liked)

Atheism

4957 readers
66 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The story began in early 2017, when Abigail Piland was born without any obvious problems. But when the midwife who helped deliver her checked back the next day, Abigail didn’t look healthy. The midwife told mother Rachel Piland to take the child to a hospital because the baby “could suffer brain damage or die if not properly cared for.”

Rachel refused, insisting “God makes no mistakes.”

Days later, Abigail was dead. (Rachel and her husband Joshua then prayed for Abigail’s resurrection. Surprise: That didn’t work, either.)

A medical examiner later attributed the death to “unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia and kernicterus,” both jaundice-related problems that were treatable. Abigail never had the chance to see a doctor when blood was coming out of her mouth, or when she wasn’t eating, or when her skin became further discolored. All because her parents put more trust in God than someone who could actually help.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Is it a good time to discuss parenting licence?

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like a way to prevent "undesirable" people from having children. Just so, so wide open to abuse.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yea I don't really believe in its applicability too but doesn't prevent me from wishing it in a more "ideal" form despite being very dangerously parallel to eugenics. It is just hard to think of anything else when you read a news about a baby dying while vomiting blood.

But about the topic of abuse, everything is open to abuse by billionaires including law, but we still have them.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

Honestly the eugenics issues aside the idea of the state regulating one of the most basic facets of humanity disgusts me.

What does that look like, forced birth control, forced abstinence, forced abortions? Sounds like a dystopian hell

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago

No. There's no ethical way to implement something like that. Even if there was, it's ripe for abuse by the wrong administration.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not parenting licenses, but well funded child protective services. Investigations into claims. Serious monitoring of home schoolers.

As I have been trying to get ANYONE to listen to for the past year, for example, the state of Oklahoma actively does not investigate child welfare cases (except occasionally to take away native or Black children.)

The internal phone system at Oklahoma DHS is NOT WORKING. They have the incorrect numbers for several state agencies, and have been forwarding reports intended for the police to a very confused Hispanic man. This is absolutely insane and should be newsworthy, but no one gives a shit.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You could try reaching out to reporters at ProPublica. Each bio link describes what they cover, so you can target those likely to have an interest.

https://www.propublica.org/staff/#news-staff

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I’ve been hitting up John Sullivan - he investigated the facility that I am trying to get shut down back when it was under a different name. (How the fuck do you kill a kid, and then immediately get to open up a new facility?)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I think nurses should be able to ideally forcefully remove a child into medical care when parents are this stupid but of course with the current political climate in the US, I wouldn't be surprised if KFC Junior praised them (typo intentional)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Good as any.

What exactly is your plan for when someone without a license is found with a baby?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

What exactly is your plan when parents are so stupid that a baby dies vomiting blood due to a medically preventable condition?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They go to prison. Is on the title.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That does not prevent a baby from dying while vomiting blood though

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

The question is what to do when the baby dies, not how to prevent it.

I don't know how to prevent it, but from this raises a personal grievance of mine. Having a child is easy, even idiots can do it and many do by accident. Adopting a child is mind boggling difficult. This isn't fair for parents or children.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm just spitballing here. Slap a fine on them for sure. Maybe perform an assessment for license issuance, and if found ineligible for a license for whatever reason, treat it the same as when a parent is found unfit by CPS.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh good, Millions of children being removed from their parents and thown into a system of state care that is known to be not particularly good is sure to work out well

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Yea state care isn't great agreed (whether or not that can be fixed is another topic I guess), if the punishment is more deterrent and the rates of incidence low, reparenting would be preferred. However for that people's mindset of parenting should be greatly changed too. People should be more sympathetic towards/used to the idea of parenting a kid who is not their genetic successor.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

In any given situation, that will make things worse for the child.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

They want you to say: STERILISATION.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Straight to Jail!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've held this belief for years but have been afraid to voice it for fear of being labelled a eugenicist or something

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I mean it is a thing which can turn into eugenics with only a little push so there must be counter weights, like life long imprisonment for anyone trying to turn this into eugenics I guess?