this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
53 points (100.0% liked)
PC Gaming
11717 readers
1101 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion.
PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
No, it has way more options and scaling types thatn gamescope. Also it can do pretty good framegen. I use it all the time.
Not a fan of framegen personally. I've been fine with just gamescope since they added the pixel art scaling. I haven't really had a need for any other type of scaling filter in my experience.
Framegen has to be used on a game where I have 30-40fps.
If I have 29fps, my character lags like they're drunk.
If I have 50+fps, I don't need framegen.
Cyberpunk 2077 is the only game I use it on.
That's fair. I mostly use framegen to get from 40-60 fps in games. You stop seeing the artifacts pretty quickly, even with something like Losseless Scaling, which doesn't have access to internal game data like a native implementation would.