655
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

This story seems to have faded in the wake of events ad nauseam. We are all aware of Senor Luigi. However, most folks can’t recall the full name of the guy that allegedly Luigi gunned down. Mission accomplished.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 61 points 1 week ago

I still don’t think it’s even Luigi that did it. Looks nothing like the guy from the video

[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago

Im not even sure I trust that video. It has artifacts that make it look doctored to me.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Classic oligarchs, pinning their crimes on the underprivileged...

Rich white males from prestigious families? Hang on, wait a minute.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

That's a fair point but it is the state' job to prove their case to throw a jury and their dragging feet and doing fucky shit. After spending a month or two litigating the case in media.

They acted like it was a proven fact that he did it... They gonna need to convince the public now beyond chain of trust me bros

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

TBF there is a lot of evidence against him, such as his social media history, book reviews about how "protesting doesn't work", the murder weapon and bag full of $20k, complete lack of alibi, and his traveling in the opposite direction of the crime discreetly by hopping bus to bus.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

That's circumstantial

Also, the conviction starter pack backpack is likely tainted and or planted.

We don't if has a alibi as of now

Finally, the state has to prove that he actually did the job.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Planted or otherwise the evidence against him is overwhelming.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

“Planted or otherwise?” Lol if it’s planted, it’s NOT EVIDENCE bro, literally wtf

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Thats for the court to decide, not you.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

You drinking too much koolaid that government was selling on fake news.

Since when people around here started trusting police and government lol

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So to clarify your stance is that

A) The supposed evidence against him doesn't exist, its fake news

and also

B) The evidence was clearly planted

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

There is no evidence that he was the person who shot the parasite.

Defense is challenging back pack because police didn't follow the protocol. If they didn't follow the protocol then there is no way to know if items in back were there when back was seized.

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
655 points (100.0% liked)

Explain Like I'm Five

17696 readers
1 users here now

Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS