this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
357 points (100.0% liked)
Leopards Ate My Face
7275 readers
1008 users here now
Rules:
- The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
- Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
- If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
- Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
- For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
- Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
- This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
- All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.
Also feel free to check out [email protected] (also active).
Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.
_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
And here I was afraid there was no justice left in the world. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
no no sir, those are not your American children. those are you illegal children whom will be deported soon.
thanks dismantling of birthright citizenship!
I still haven't wrapped my head around this one. Wasn't birthright enshrined in the constitution? How can it be dismantled?
They have some nutty interpretation that when the amendment was written the writers didn't mean for it to apply to everyone. Basically it's something like the children of noncitizens owe allegiance to the country of their parents, so they don't count. The bit they're trying to use is what prevents e.g. children of diplomats from gaining citizenship.
Thank you for actually answering my question.
Because they do what ever they want… it takes years to appeal a single case so they are just steamrolling hundreds and hundreds….
(And the Supreme Court simply takes a red pen to change whatever they want… )
Again, how? You can't take someone's citizenship away if not through court, right? What excuses are judges using to do that?
That’s the neat part… ICE doesn’t even have to go through a judge to deport someone. They can just kinda do it… and it’s been an issue for YEARS. Only now they were allowed to go into overdrive, completely unchecked.
https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/blog/ice-deport-us-citizens/
So they don’t have to strip citizenship, they just send people to other countries and move on with their day. Then the courts are so swamped with appeals that it’s likely most will just give up and make a new life in the other country.
Mental! Thanks for the answer.
So is the separation of church and state.
And the right against unreasonable search and seizures.
But it turns out writing it down doesn't make it so. It's not a fundamental law of the universe. It has to actually be upheld and defended for it to do anything. Until the American people do something they'll just keep walking all over it.
The difference is that citizenship is about papers. It's a law about law. So how are they circumventing it to pull citizenship from people? Operationally, how is it done.
If you show the person at the border your paper, and they still won't let you in, it doesn't matter that you have the paper. It is just that simple. It's illegal, but when the people who are supposed to be enforcing the laws are the ones breaking them, there isn't any real recourse short of a popular uprising.
maga has infected the minds of canadians, probably albertans.