Lemmy.ca's Main Community

3257 readers

21 users here now

Welcome to the lemmy.ca/c/main community!

All new users on lemmy.ca are automatically subscribed to this community, so this is the place to read announcements, make suggestions, and chat about the goings-on of lemmy.ca.

For support requests specific to lemmy.ca, you can use [email protected].

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

[New Rule discussion] No Editorializing Article Titles. The original title of the article must be used. (lemmy.ca)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Edit: This rule seems to be much more nuanced and requires more thought than we had put in, please continue to discuss below.

It is NOT in effect at this time but highly recommend for regional subreddits at least.

~~The above rule has been added to the instance and will be enforced instance wide.~~ This rule is very common within most existing communities where news articles are shared and avoids sensationalizing the story or attempts at steering discussion by the user posting the article.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

But is it a necessity?

https://lemmy.ca/post/1088973

Posts like this one is why regional communities on the dead site had rules like this. So yeah it can be argued that it's necessary.

Generally my flow with writing a typical article-based Lemmy post is: Article title or one-liner paraphrase of article in the header, more details/summary in the body staying mostly neutral with only a bit of my opinion, and my full opinion on it within a separate comment.

That fits within the intention of the rule in my opinion.