this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
544 points (98.2% liked)

News

30309 readers
3200 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 89 points 2 years ago (3 children)

In the speech in support of the ceasefire resolution, the Democratic Florida state representative Angie Nixon said: “We are at 10,000 dead Palestinians. How many will be enough?”

“All of them,” Michelle Salzman called in reply.

wow

The remarks came during a debate in the state legislature about calling for a ceasefire in Israel’s invasion of Gaza, which has so far killed more than 10,000 Palestinians, many of whom are children. The assault came after Hamas fighters attacked Israel from Gaza, killing at least 1,400 people and taking more than 200 hostage. ... The Florida state house later voted 104-2 to reject Nixon’s resolution.

The resolution only called for a ceasefire?

On Thursday, Joe Biden said there was “no possibility” of a ceasefire.

I'm ootl on that.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The last bit you quoted about Biden is referring to statements he made about Biden asking Netanyahu about the possibility of a ceasefire and that Bibi told Biden there is none.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What are you saying? The article links to this:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2023/11/09/remarks-by-president-biden-before-marine-one-departure-39/

Q (Inaudible) Gaza ceasefire, Mr. President?

THE PRESIDENT: Pardon me?

Q What are the chances of a Gaza ceasefire?

THE PRESIDENT: None. No possibility.

Q Any update on getting hostages out?

THE PRESIDENT: We’re still optimistic.

Q What’s the — what’s the delay on getting more hostages?

Q What’s your message to the families of the hostages in Gaza?

THE PRESIDENT: We’re not going to stop until we get them out.

Q How confident are you that you will get them out?

Q What’s been the delay?

Q Mr. President, are the retaliatory strikes working? Mr. President, are the retaliatory strikes working in the Middle East?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes. I mean, they’re — they’re working in the sense that we’re hitting the targets they’re seeking.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yes, there's no possibility because he's asked and was tolled no possibility.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

This is the correct answer. There will be no cease fire until, at minimum, the hostages are released. The other problem that the Israelis have is that there's no evidence that Hamas has any intention of honoring a cease fire as they've willingly violated many such agreements in the past.

I don't have a strong opinion as to what the correct choice is here for Israel, I'm simply stating the facts as they relate to the possibility of a cease fire.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

why tf is a state legislature even wasting time on this?

they should be contacting their elected representatives in congress like anyone else.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

Only ones picking up the phones I imagine. You should attend a local school board meeting and listen to all the

"This is state level policy"

"I don't care do something about it!"

People are raising their concerns with the powers that be and they aren't listening so they go find someone with some power and yell at them.

And yeah this is not me showing contempt. I get it fully.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Biden is ride-or-die for Israel, basically.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If he wasn't, he's be called an antisemitic jew hater for daring question the Israeli narrative. Anything less than full throated support is akin to supporting Hamas according to a very large amount of stupid and/or intellectually dishonest people.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You aren't wrong, but he's been ride-or-die for Israel for his entire career. He's the most pro-Israel president we've ever had.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Reagan was seriously pro-Israel and started the whole US-supported Israeli military funding. source

Jen Kirby - You mentioned that the United States had a big investment in the Iron Dome. Why is that — what’s the US’s stake in this?

Jean-Loup Samaan - Well, first, historically, the US started cooperating with Israel on air defense in the 1980s. So when missile defense became a significant component of defense investment in the US, Israel was very quickly involved. There’s a history of close ties between both countries in that field. So it would seem, in a sense, natural that a consequence of that is to support something like Iron Dome.

I think it was around the end of Obama’s first term, in 2012, that the US put a stronger emphasis on Iron Dome in terms of budgeting. I believe it was probably not just the politics behind it, but also the strategic assessment that the priority is to protect and to strengthen the defense of Israel vis-à-vis these types of rockets.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Started? How geopolitically ignorant are you? A considerable portion of the IDF's armaments (including over 100 fighter jets) during the Yom Kippur War were flown in from the US. This was seven years before Reagan. The entirety of Israel's existence has just been the US and France dumping weapons. (Israel didn't indigenously make it's nuclear weapons, they came from France's nuclear projects, just like how the Kfir wasn't built using Israel's non-existent aerospace industry).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I quoted a source. If you don't agree with it, quote another.

And please don't call me ignorant. It's rude and uncalled for.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago

"I quoted a source"

I can smash on a keyboard and then write a citation to whatever nonsense comes. An intelligent person cross-references it with well established facts, and then decides if it's probably true.

The idea that US support for Israel started in the 80s is refuted by hundreds of data points in Israeli history.

"It's rude and uncalled for"

It's totally called for. You could literally have read the Wikipedia on history of modern Israel and seen that it was patently false.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 years ago

Okay, so Biden is the most pro-Israel president since Reagan lol

My point stands.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Since when is Biden the President of Israel?