this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
509 points (99.0% liked)

Political Memes

8061 readers
2414 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So we should probably stop giving them bombs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Who's giving bombs to both sides?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Russia maybe? Not sure that matters, though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sure, we just also have to figure out how to prevent Hamas from being given rockets.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure the US isn't giving them rockets so we're good on that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well so long as Hamas is getting rockets, Israel needs them too. When you figure out how to stop rockets getting to Hamas, then we can talk about disarming Israel.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah i don't think that's a real argument.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Why not though? If Hamas has weapons they're going to use them whether Israel can respond or not.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's still not an argument.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Why not?

On second thought, I don't really care what you think an answer will be. Blocked. Argue or don't respond.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yes it is, unless you think Israel doesn't have a right to protect it's citizens and you're okay with genocide against the Israeli Jews.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Israel is one of the wealthiest countries in the world. They are not at any serious risk of genocide and they don't need our money to keep killing Palestinians. It's the Palestinians who need help preventing genocide, not fucking Israel.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

They do need help, they can;t afford the Iron Dome without aid, and without the Iron Dome Israeli casualties would have been drastically higher.

Why do you support genocide of Israelis?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Of course Israel has a right to defend its people. Of course, it failed to do that on October 7. Still, i can't argue that most people consider this kind of revenge to be also a component of self defense. Certainly that was true, for example, with the US's war in Afghanistan.

However, speaking of genocide, Hamas (hell, all of Palestine) is not in a position to seriously threaten the Israeli people as a whole nor the Israeli Jews specifically.

Nor does this mean the US in particular is required to unconditionally provide an unlimited number of weapons to Israel.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Still, i can’t argue that most people consider this kind of revenge to be also a component of self defense.

Why did the bell ring immediately after Hamas started losing? You don't get to perform an offensive, have less success than expected and then simply call off the war.

However, speaking of genocide, Hamas (hell, all of Palestine) is not in a position to seriously threaten the Israeli people as a whole nor the Israeli Jews specifically.

The Arab states have been trying to do this literally since the creation of Israel. The only reason it hasn't occurred yet is because they lost all the wars they started.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

is required to unconditionally provide an unlimited number of weapons to Israel.

Those weapons are the only reason Hamas is not in a position to seriously threaten the Israeli people. Without them Israel would be vastly less able to defend its civilians.

You take away arms assistance to Israel without dealing with Hamas, and you will end up with many, many dead Israelis.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those weapons are the only reason Hamas is not in a position to seriously threaten the Israeli people.

Doubt it.

"Those hospitals and refugee camps are soooo scary, if we hadn't blown them up surely 10,000 Jews would have died!"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Hamas fires thousands of rockets from those locations at Israeli cities. Without the Iron Dome many Israeli civilians would have died.

You are advocating for a genocide of the Jews if you do not insist on both sides being disarmed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Hamas is literally digging up water pipes to turn them into rockets so in a roundabout way they kind of are giving them stuff to build rockets