this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
364 points (100.0% liked)

News

28185 readers
4642 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To allow for vehicles to pass one another before the end of this century.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If they're going fast enough that the speed limit isn't fast enough to pass them, maybe you don't need to pass them.

If I'm stuck behind a tractor on the road, they're probably going 15 mph and I can easily pass them by just going the speed limit. If you're stuck behind someone going 50 in a 55, tough luck. It's not like you're losing that much time anyway.

You save like 3 minutes over 30 miles. It's nothing. People just think it's so much faster because they don't do the math.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You sound like someone who has never themselves driven in real traffic before.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

🙄 That leapfrog shit where you zip in and out of crawling traffic every time there's a gap is dangerous and people shouldn't do it in the first place. If traffic is super slow then the speed limit is easily fast enough to pass anyway.

Also, it shouldn't be your job to speed to make up for bad traffic. That's a failure of public policy and engineering. We should fix that.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are a number of scenarios where one might do 10+ over the speed limit to get around someone on the highway that does not involve the leap-frogging-in-crawling-traffic maneuver you're referring to.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, you might want to get around them, but only to save a couple of minutes. If someone is going slow enough for me to give a shit, the speed limit is enough to pass. Otherwise, tough luck, you have to go 50 in a 55

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not being able to pass a slow car just angers people.

People who are angry about the slow car are probably going to ride their ass.

People riding other people's ass don't have enough following distance to react to an emergency brake.

Now there's an accident and traffic comes to a half.

People coming up from behind are in the same scenario.

Now there's a pileup.

Congrats! You've now made the roads less safe.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And pileups never happen when people speed 🙄

You know what? You're right.

Let's ban private car ownership.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let’s ban private car ownership.

Or even better, just create viable public transportation, and discourage the plague of suburbia. Let the people who want to drive drive. And the people who only see it as a means to get from point A to B out of cars.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Except those people who want to drive have a huge burden on society for basically no reason. Fuck em. Nobody gets to drive.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Speeding also makes the road less safe. No matter what speed you’re moving at, the issue you describe will exist. So I don’t agree that slowing traffic makes things more dangerous. In fact there is a huge amount of data that proves the opposite.

This is just mental gymnastics to justify what people want to believe—that they have a right to drive as fast as they want no matter what. Sorry, it isn’t true.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

If everyone is driving 10mph above the speed limit, we’re back to square one.