this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
408 points (100.0% liked)

News

29384 readers
3465 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

MILWAUKEE (CNN) - A woman in Milwaukee says her Kia has been stolen three times, even after she installed a free security upgrade meant to prevent this crime from happening.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't see this as Kia's fault at all. These cars were bare basement bottom of the line cars. They included very limited security systems. It is not a responsibility of the manufacturer to provide any level of security or to help you when your shit is stolen.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is their responsibility to not make a security system so bad that teens with a USB drive can steal the car.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, it isnt. That would just drive up the cost and make it even more unaffordable. They made important cars that cater to a specific demographic, and it was a complete non-issue before it became a TikTok trend.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The thing is, the exact same models sold in Canada have immobilizers installed in them as standard. And it costs just a couple of bucks per car for them to do that. I guess your point is kinda valid in the sense that because they weren’t required by law to do it in the US, they didn’t. While they didn’t break any laws, it’s still a dumb thing to do to penny pinch. All their 2023 models and up now have immobilizers on them with prices still within their class range, so it’s not like they couldn’t do it.

Also, they aren’t exactly bottom of the barrel anymore nowadays and their cars are sold at a premium.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And it costs just a couple of bucks per car

Where did you get that idea?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

You can buy an aftermarket immobilizer for $30 on amazon. A car manufacturer can probably get them for cheaper in bulk.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Helen, why were immobilizers standard in just about every other manufacturer's vehicles? Some things are not the burden of the consumer - you should not need to be an expert in your doctors provided care or in the additives in your toothpaste. Do you know why? because even if you arrogantly thought you had a grasp on it, you'd likely be doing a shit job, because you're not a doctor or a chemical engineer. The government should have regulated this as a standard need, but short of that, this is was much of a standard as you can have (especially in Europe).

It's a great example though of how enough companies to make an impact WILL NOT do the right thing unless it is mandated. Hyundai was the test balloon and if they got away with it, others would have followed. Only good news arid this is that the PR shit show Hyundai bought for themselves will scare off other manufacturer's from shedding those $1.24 worth of parts from their BOM for another few years at least.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

why were immobilizers standard in just about every other manufacturer's vehicles?

They aren't. They're offered in many cars to prevent theft. 🤯

Some things are not the burden of the consumer

Lots of things are not anyone's burden. Like immobilizers. I mean maybe one day UNICEF will enter the immobilization industry and we can all have them for free. Until then, it costs someone money. If the consumer wants to pay for it, they can choose 1 of hundreds of other vehicles. If they don't, that is their choice also. It's not the manufacturer's burden.

you should not need to be an expert in your doctors provided care or in the additives in your toothpaste.

And you don't have to be. That's why there are doctors and dentists. You do still maintain a responsibility of educating yourself on some basic level and maintaining your personal health. Not really sure what your point was there.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Immobilisers have been mandatory in all new cars sold in Germany since 1 January 1998, in the United Kingdom since 1 October 1998, in Finland since 1998, in Australia since 2001 and in Canada since 2007.

Unfortunately in the good old US of A that is somehow not the case, but it remains a fact that it is a bare minimum requirement for vehicle security. You will not purchase a vehicle in America that is not a Kia that does not have an immobilizer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's great. I'm happy for those countries. What does that have to do with this conversation?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fact that they are, factually, standard on every other manufacturer's vehicles, like you want to insist they aren't. You're clearly refusing to understand the words being communicated to you so, good luck in life I guess, this conversation is done.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well it must be true because you said it was, right? 😂

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can buy an add-on immobilizer on Amazon or eBay for $20. The cost to a car company to build this into the computer in the factory should be under $10. Virtually every other car company has used them by default in everything since the mid 1990s.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's probably garbage. OEMs aren't installing garbage. That would make the situation 10x worse.