this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
243 points (100.0% liked)

Music

9281 readers
361 users here now

↳ Our family Communities:

➰#Music

Music.world - [email protected]

Jazz -[email protected]

Album Art Porn - [email protected]

Fake Album Covers - [email protected]

Obscure Music - [email protected]

Vinyl and LP's - [email protected]

Electronic Dance Music - [email protected]

60's Music - [email protected]

70's Music - [email protected]

80's Music - [email protected]

90's Music - [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I feel like people are starting themselves blind on per-stream revenue in a bad way - no one is actually paying per stream. Not the customers, not the streaming companies, not the labels. This is the deal when it comes to streaming platforms - you get to listen to as much as you want for a fixed amount of money per month.

It's a little bit like saying someone who bought a CD in the 90s for $10 and listened to every song 100 times is a 10 times worse customer than someone who bought the same CD and listened to every song just 10 times. Yes, the person who listened to the CD 100 times paid 10 times less on a per-song listen basis, but that's quite simply not relevant.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the latest issue now is how Spotify for example is changing their revenue sharing model in a way that big artists (i.e. Taylor Swift) get a bigger chunk from the pie and smaller artists get close to nothing in % from streaming income. So the value of a single stream for a song is different depending on who you're listening to.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What change is this in reference to? I'm not familiar with it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

There is a finite amount of music that you can listen to in a month.