this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
869 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69156 readers
2725 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
869
Rabbit R1 AI box revealed to just be an Android app (arstechnica.com)
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
209 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
  • Rabbit R1 AI box is actually an Android app in a limited $200 box, running on AOSP without Google Play.
  • Rabbit Inc. is unhappy about details of its tech stack being public, threatening action against unauthorized emulators.
  • AOSP is a logical choice for mobile hardware as it provides essential functionalities without the need for Google Play.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

1% correct is never "fairly high" wtf

Also if you want a computer that you don't have to double check, you literally are expecting software to embody the concept of God. This is fucking stupid.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

1% correct is never “fairly high” wtf

It's all about context. Asking a bunch of 4 year olds questions about trigonometry, 1% of answers being correct would be fairly high. 'Fairly high' basically only means 'as high as expected' or 'higher than expected'.

Also if you want a computer that you don’t have to double check, you literally are expecting software to embody the concept of God. This is fucking stupid.

Hence, it is useless. If I cannot expect it to be more or less always correct, I can skip using it and just look stuff up myself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Obviously the only contexts that would apply here are ones where you expect a correct answer. Why would we be evaluating a software that claims to be helpful against 4 year old asked to do calculus? I have to question your ability to reason for insinuating this.

So confirmed. God or nothing. Why don't you go back to quills? Computers cannot read your mind and write this message automatically, hence they are useless

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Obviously the only contexts that would apply here are ones where you expect a correct answer.

That's the whole point, I don't expect correct answers. Neither from a 4 year old nor from a probabilistic language model.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

And you don't expect a correct answer because it isn't 100% of the time. Some lemmings are basically just clones of Sheldon Cooper

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

I don't expect a correct answer because I've used these models quite a lot last year. At least half the answers were hallucinated. And it's still a common complaint about this product as well if you look at actual reviews (e.g., pretty sure Marques Brownlee mentions it).