this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
313 points (100.0% liked)

News

30502 readers
3917 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 166 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Amazon Fresh just became the latest big-box retailer to cut costs on thousands of items, following in the footsteps of Walmart and Target in reversing course on years of inflation-induced price hikes

Greed-induced. Inflation-excused.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Corporations are always greedy, so this factor never changed. It could not have been the cause of inflation, since we had greedy corporations and more inflation before.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I want to point out that your reasoning is irrational which makes your conclusion nonsense.

You didn't root cause or analyze anything, then declared yourself to be right "because".

Here I'll show you, let me use your method to "prove" something.

"The Potato Party has always been in charge in Tombo County, the hungry kids in schools are not the fault of The Potato Party because kids here have been hungry before."

We can "prove" so many things this way!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The Potato Party could have changed its policies, so your comparison is not apt. Corporations have never been not greedy, so what changed?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The pandemic, constant coverage of inflation giving them a shield to raise prices and blame inflation even when their SEC filings indicate that this is complete bullshit, and crucially greater consolidation resulting in fewer options for grocery shoppers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Are you sure? Here's the markup since the pandemic

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

…a global pandemic? That excuse let them raise prices far beyond their actual cost inflation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, so the issue was people could afford to pay more when they got their stimulus. Which is the point of the stimulus, it worked 100%

The question is whether the skeptics that said the stimulus would cause inflation were right. Is it the corporate greed or does giving everyone money increase prices?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, that’s not what the issue was. The stimulus was a drop in the bucket, and I think it’s insane to talk like people “have more money now” because they got a check for like a thousand dollars 4 years ago. That shit was gone the week after it was given, probably to rent in most cases.

The price increases were blamed on supply chain issues, which did exist, but not to the degree that could justify the increase.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There were several stimulus checks, so maybe some people spent it on rent and some saved it and spent it on going out when the shutdowns were over

You can see that people spent a whole lot more on food in 2022

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably that the greedy became greedier. Greed isn't exactly linear, it's exponential. It used to be:

Boss makes a dollar, I make a dime

Today's version goes something like:

Boss makes a million, I don't make jack

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

that's why when I'm at work

I like to smoke crack

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The greed is constant, but the opportunities to excuse price increases are not. Egg prices jumped up about 6x because they had the excuse of bird flu, but the prices magically went down (but stayed elevated) after the government threatened an investigation. As ineffectual as our government has been made, increasing prices out of nowhere with no plausible excuses will invite an investigation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

So my point is instead of blaming greedy corporations, we just discussed possible causes and solutions. Isn't this a more constructive conversation?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So my point is instead of blaming greedy corporations, we just discussed possible causes and solutions. Isn't this a more constructive conversation?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You admit that corporations are always greedy, so how is out of the realm of possibility that an excuse like supply chain issues (which have since been resolved) would provide the perfect opportunity for these greedy corporations to jack up prices far beyond those underlying causes and get away with it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The margin hasn't changed much

So that means the corporations got the same % on their sales

What you thought would happen: thing X cost the corp $10 and they sold it for $15. When it costs $20 they sell it for $25

What actually happened: it cost $20 and they sold it for $30

That's because investors hate it when the margin goes down

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the source of this graph?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

A twitter post isn't a good source. Where are they getting their data from? What are "weights" in this case?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Corporations all raised prices at the same time. No competition to offset the greed. Normally that level of coordination is impossible among different companies, at least some would keep prices lower to retain customers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Normally that level of coordination is impossible among different companies, at least some would keep prices lower to retain customers.

The biggest con in the world. You would think people are not capable of organizing for a common cause.

That level of coordination IS possible when all you need is a bunch of CXOs and investors in a union.

You think collusion to keep prices is not possible? Does that people people agreeing on a specific set of laws and policies living in a demarcated region (a country) is not possible?