this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
1297 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

31068 readers
4683 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Philharmonic3@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Look I get it, but also, I like fahrenheit and miles. They are more intuitive and closer to the 'feeling'. 100 degrees is really hot. 100 mph is really fast. Maybe that's my own bias from growing up with it though

[–] Hubi@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, I think it's mostly just a familiarity thing. To me 0°C is cold af, 10°C is chilly, 20°C is nice and 30°C is hot. 100 km/h is fast but not really fast, though I'm probably biased in this regard from regularly driving on the Autobahn lol

[–] businessfish@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

exactly! whenever anyone says imperial units are "more intuitive" and better reflect "how it feels to humans", i can only think: obviously, you grew up with it. that's what you know.

no matter what measurement system you were raised on, it will feel intuitive to you and reflect how you as a human experience the world because you are used to measuring things in those units. having said that, i'd much rather we used metric if for nothing else than the ease of unit conversion.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

When it comes to Fahrenheit, there is some merit to the idea - 0 to 30 is a small scale compared to 0 to 100, and unlike Imperial vs. Metric, Celcius has no base 10 system that makes any more sense than Fahrenheit does. . The opposite is true of kilometers and miles - kilometers is more refined since each unit is a shorter distance.

I'd prefer the Metric system, but Farenheit over Celcius for temperature measurement.

[–] pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The fixed points (for 0 and 100) are much more logical though and can be used to accurately recreate the scale anywhere (well.. it'll be slightly off on higher altitude since boiling temperature changes but it's still not far off).

0°C = water freezes (= it's snowing)

100°C = water boils

meanwhile:

0°F = the coldest night Mr Fahrenheit experienced, thinking it couldn't get any colder than that

100°F = Mr Fahrenheit's own body temperature (he had a slight fever apparently)

How would you recreate that??

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The temperature of water boiling is not a useful metric when it comes to the weather, as it's extremely far outside of where humans can live. Science uses Celcius standard, and that seems to work fine, but I see no reason why we should use it for the weather.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The temperature of ice melting, on the other hand, is hugely important for weather. 0 point is placed at a very important spot as far as weather observations go.

Can't say that of Fahrenheit.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

We'll just keep things as they are becuase it seems to be working fine.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Fine except for the Mars Climate Orbiter.

[–] pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The previous systems also worked fine in other parts of the world, but pretty much every country came to the conclusion that it's simply smart to switch to the metric system, giving up their own with seemingly random conversions.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

And those that didn't don't seem to be suffering any ill effects as a result.

[–] pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

I think we can agree that the freezing point is super important when it comes to the weather.

So where would you place the second mark (you have to define two spots) so it "makes sense for the weather" (I don't see how it makes less sense for the weather than Fahrenheit, at least Celsius tells you if it'll snow or not while Fahrenheit tells you nothing) while still making sure that it can easily be recreated?

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago

I am not water.

[–] Soku@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

The temperatures are intuitive for me because Celsius is all I've known. The car going 60km/h or 100km/ h I know the difference and how it feels sitting in the car. The speed of wind in the forecast needs to be m/s to make any sense. Over 20 m/s I better tape the windows so that the storm won't break them

[–] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, what would you consider "too cold to go out"? Not really about the metric/celcius system, but 0c is light jacket weather for me.

[–] Hubi@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Anything below or around zero degrees is undershirt, shirt, sweater and warm jacket weather for me. Though it rarely gets colder than single negative digits where I live. I'll go with a light jacket from like 10-15 degrees upwards. I can't handle the cold very well lol.

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's an artefact of the "now".

In Australia we once had the imperial system and about a year after the big switch (14 Feb 1966) we became all metric like a mofo. Now 35c feels hot and 15c feels cold. Plus units of ten is so much easier than factions.

Ask the US military about the metric system, they've been using it since at least Vietnam, if not earlier.

[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago

Not only is 100C is also really hot, it's the boiling point of water. Now that's a 100 degrees that really stands for something.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"intuitive" in the sense you described just means "familiar". One feels like one. Ten feels like ten.

The magic of metric isn't that each base unit is somehow more valuable in metric. It isn't. One will always feel like one.

The magic is how easy it is to convert from the "small one", the "medium one" and the "big one".

Also, the convention of fractional inches is ridiculous.

It should be trivial to order 27/64, 3/8, and 7/16. Don't make me do that math.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hard disagree on the fractional units. Using rational numbers for those things derives from the frequency with which people need to double and halve things in the fields that use those conventions. Doubling 3/8 to get 6/8 or 3/4 is much easier than doubling .375 to get .75

That one's nothing to do with the metric system vs imperial, aside from the fields that rely on the convention being largely the ones that created imperial in the first place. If they all switched to metric tomorrow they'd just say they need 3/5 meter spacing.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Does Germany use 3/5m spacing?

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I looked it up and they use 2/5 meter spacing. Some other countries nearby use 3/5th though.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

And it's described locally as 2/5 and 3/5, rather than 40 or 60 cm?

If so, I'm shocked, but delighted to have learned something unexpected

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

From everything I've heard it's a hodge podge, since the US, with the worst system, is the only one to use it consistently. Building plans would reference it by cm however.

What I was more referring to was from the perspective of the carpenter doing the work.
Fractions or decimals aren't specific to us customary or metric. You see decimal inches perfectly often, or at least I do.
Fractions are a more convenient way of dealing with multiplying or dividing numbers without a lot of mental effort. 1/3 of .125 is gonna take a second to figure out. 1/3 of 1/8 is 1/24. 5 1/8 units is just ”5/8”, rather than the .625 in decimal.
It's definitely less effective for numerical sorting in your head, but if I'm sorting screws or something, I'm probably gonna just look at them rather than compare the labels.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I understand the underlying principle, but I'm not sure if it actually shakes out that way for a few reasons:

If you asked a carpenter to cut something to 1/24", they'd be like "what?". Sure, the math was easier, but the result is unusable. No measuring instrument has divisions of 24ths. The person making a cut would need it in terms of 8ths, 16ths, etc. Any time saved at the initial stage is lost when they need to convert it again to a useable denominator.

Secondly, what's 3/32nds of 17/128ths?

The examples you give are harder in decimal form because nobody is going to make metric carpentry designs for things that are to the tenth of a millimeter, so 1.25cm isn't even real.

I admit, there are a lot of specific scenarios where fractional convention is helpful. I just personally think they don't outweigh the drawbacks.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's fair to not be as big of a fan. I'm also not saying that rational numbers are more useful in every situation.

I don't think it's to controversial to say that it's generally easier to deal with rational numbers mentally than decimal numbers if you need to use fractional units. Metrics advantage is that you need to use fractional units less often.

Your example is indeed tricky, but it's still easier than 0.09375 * 0.1328125. I'd much rather do 3 * 17 and 32 * 128.

People making metric designs for things is one thing, but people in metric countries definitely get cabinets built, and those need adjustments that are definitely smaller than a millimeter.

I feel like this is all getting away from the original point though. Fractions are useful when multiplying and dividing whole numbers. Metric did not change how carpenters or craftsmen actually do their work, and how they work is the entire reason people use those fractional units.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Metric and imperial don't change the way carpenters work because in the case you mentioned of a sub-mm dimension, that's in the 64th of an inch range. Carpenters don't ever measure to that precision because of the fluidity of the material. Craftsman will at that point just cut to fit.

My point with those hard numbers wasn't that metric would make those numbers easier, only that your examples were intrinsically favouring imperial measures. Maybe it's easier to say:

What's easier to figure out, 1/3 of 3cm or 1/3 of 1 93/512 inches? You can easily construct scenarios for a measure that are easy in one and obscene in the equivalent. It's less about the notation and more about the measure. If you assume all of the initial measures are round in imperial units, then the math will automatically be easier. If your designs were designed in metric, they'll be round to metric. If they're in imperial, they'll be round in imperial.

And when this degree of precision is actually important, imperial craftsmen (engineers, machinists) already use decimal. A "Mil" is a milli-inch.

Anyhow, again, I agree that for some very specific scenarios dealing with fractions is easier, especially when you're doing any base 2 operation.

I just think that you would be surprised how infrequently the issues you're imagining would actually manifest themselves, working with intrinsically metric designs, and that you're underestimating the number of scenarios where not dealing with fractions actually would make your life easier.

[–] mihnt@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 months ago

I feel the same way about Fahrenheit, but boy do people hate it when you say it out loud.

I've never had to use Kilometers much but I'm sure I wouldn't have much trouble adapting to that as much.

[–] tiredofsametab@kbin.run 6 points 10 months ago

How would you even measure "They are more intuitive and closer to the 'feeling'". It's not. You're used to it. No one else in the world that grew up with C is going to find F more intuitive. Neither miles.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I also find inches easier to work with unless I'm making something with my 3d printer. Fractions are just easier when you're making something big with looser tolerances.

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

3 2/10 cm is easier than 3.2cm?

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Doing things in 1/16ths of an inch is easier than metric for like woodworking and such IMO. Especially since most tools and materials come in inches here. Until you get into stuff that has tighter tolerances than 1/16th of an inch. Even then you could go to .010s or .001s of an inch but I'm more used to metric at that scale and that's what the applications I use for 3d printing default to.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

1/16 of an inch is slightly smaller than a millimeter, you'd just end up using a millimeter or half again as your tolerance limit.

The big issue with imperial is all the fractions and strange conversions. On more then one occasion I've caught myself mixing up eighths and quarters, because my brain views them more as concepts then as numbers. Which is bigger, 11/16 or 3/4? Now, you'll get the answer, sure, but you had to think about it and it goes against the natural intuition that larger numbers are bigger. Compare that with, which is bigger 0.6875 or 0.75 and it should be trivial to see which is easier to learn and use.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

0.6875 is basically a meaningless concept to me when I try to picture it in my head and what if you need to add it to another dimension? It's not easy to work 4 decimal places in your head. .75 only works because I automatically convert it to 3/4. Maybe it's just something that comes with experience but I don't have trouble with knowing what's what. If your not sure you can always make the denominator equal and figure it that way. 3/4=12/16 for instance. Easy math to do in your head.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Sure, but your measuring system dictates what lengths you actually design things to be. You would never actually use 0.6875, but if some jerk designed something with that length, it will be easy to tell exactly how big it was. If you switched to metric, your smallest practical unit for woodworking would almost certainly be a millimeter.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

you don't get it.

your tools and materials will come in metric when everything is metric.

doing things on 1/10 of an inch or 1/10 of a cm is the same as 0.1 inches or 0.1 cm.

1/16 = 0.0625

3/16 of an inch = 0.1875 inches

as in "1/16th" literally means "one divided by sixteen, so do extra math instead of just giving you the real number"

decimal doesn't mean, nor have anything to do with metric.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So I have to throw out all my stuff and spend $1000s on new tools?

You don't work in 1/10ths of an inch. It's 1/16ths and that that's where the math ends. You don't need to convert it to decimal. Unless you're doing machining which you do work in .0001ths due to the tighter tolerances and I've already agreed you might as well use metric for that.

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

you're talking about two or three different, unrelated things.

  1. decimals vs fractions - you're whining that 1/16 gives you more leeway, but too stupid to realise that 1/10 is less precise and is the same as 0.1

So either you're happy with less precision - and decimals are good, or you want more precision - and decimals are still good.

Again - absolutely nothing to do with metric. You can convert 3 3/4 inches to 3.75 inches, 3 12/16ths or 3 7.5/10ths of an inch. They're all the same thing and all imperial.

  1. Tools. The topic is "using metric". Once you have all metric tools, then it doesn't matter. You're trying to change the topic to buying new tools. Unrelated. Using a tool vs shopping like a princess for new toys. We're talking about using tools.

  2. but hey, while we're on the topic of how dumb you are, let's keep using what you say against you. You keep saying "it doesn't have to be that accurate" well, okay then. then get a sharpie, write the approximate metric conversion on the side and get on with your life. A 5 minute job for someone who I presume can write numbers and count to ten?

  3. I knew there were more. What you don't get, what you keep missing, is that 1/16 is smaller than 1/10. that means your bitching about "tighter tolerances" applies more to dicking about with 1/16ths instead of 1/10s (which again, is decimals, nothing to do with metric)

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you can't have a civil conversation without insults I'm not going to bother with you anymore. We're talking about units of measurement, there's no reason to be an asshole. Go fuck yourself.

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

yes, we are talking about units of measurement, which is why you talking about fractions is irrelevant. Thank you for agreeing with me.

jeezus chris on a cracker you're a slow one.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I'm a European living in the UK for 9 years. I still don't know what a mile is. There's nothing intuitive about Imperial units, you're just used to them.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah, and the benefits of switching does not out weigh the costs, like redoing all the signage and re-educating everyone and inevitable higher accident rate.