this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
464 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68567 readers
3890 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 129 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Imagine if they had instead hired 500,000 people on $100,000 each. They could have bought the entire city of Detroit and had it making Teslas, instead they've got one coked up narcissist.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Musk is not getting billions worth salary. You can't hire 500,000 people using his package. Unless you believe that these workers should be eating shares instead of food.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Once the shares vest then he can get the money. The point still stands, just not immediately.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The point doesn't stand, because you can't get 500,000 people.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why not? People once believed that you couldn't get $56b just for one person.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Ok, imagine the following scenario. Tesla decides not to pay Musk and hire all these people instead. Would you join the workforce? They will give you share options with a three year vesting period and zero salary. Go on, join them on these conditions!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There is currently a huge labor shortage in the united states, particularly for engineers and skilled craft and trades people. There's no fucking way they would be able to hire 10,000, let alone 500,000 people. Hell, my company has had two engineering positions open for 2 years and we have had zero applicants. Zero!

Everybody just wants to be retired or be a social media influencer these days, with that amazing side hustle as a door dasher.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

It is a hard labor market, but we've been able to hire engineering positions. If you're not getting applicants, get a better recruiter.

The real issue is our backwards immigration system. We should be expanding immigration when labor is short, not talking about restrictions. If they wanted, they could lobby for better immigration with that $56B instead of giving it to someone who already has hundreds of billions.

Also, many Teslas aren't built in the US anyway, so there's not much stopping them from looking elsewhere for labor.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Even if the shares drop by 90% of their value after distribution and liquidation, that's still 50,000 people you could pay 100,000.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

It's still incredibly stupid to dilute your own votes and give him more votes...

They could also sell shares to raise money to hire more people...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

I've read that all they're doing is diluting the current shares, so in essence the current shareholders are screwing themselves over by devaluing their own shares.

Pretty dumb