https://github.com/launchbadge/sqlx
Not an ORM, but uses Rust's compile time macros so you can write raw SQL and it will type check everything against either a real database connection or a JSON cache of the database's schema.
Absolute best of both worlds.
I'd absolutely qualify it as non-secure in this context. Signal is E2E encrypted but there are no systems in place where it understands who's added to a chat and validates access based on ACLs or anything. Authorization policies are critical in securing systems.
I thought you are going to mention that she's receiving an enormous amount of money from the government, even though she's Republican.
I can forgive someone for now knowing who specifically enacted some bill or something, but being simultaneously against supporting people with government handouts while relying on $400K from the government to survive? Wtf.
Four times???? We're almost diving by zero here. Sanders is basically infinity times more sane.
Everything was worse at some point earlier on. That doesnt mean much. PRC came from ROC, so it wasn't progress.
It sounds like that's what I'm talking about. It was Imperial -> ROC -> PRC, not Imperial -> PRC.
The only progress was ROC. PRC was worse.
It's like saying "Oh you don't like Trump fucking up everything in our government so it's way more authoritarian? Well it's much better than when the US was imperial England, so it's still progress."
There's a step missing.
But before CCP wasn't it ROC, not imperial China?
Well it's not slavery - you still get paid.
It's just that everything you're paid and probably more will get sucked back into the economy to pay for necessities to live, and if you don't make enough money to afford that then you die.
But they aren't killing you directly, so not the same thing.
Yep, we disagree. The world and technology especially is an extremely complicated place. IMO any complex system that is built upon "humans should just know all this complexity and keep it in mind all the time" is fundamentally broken.
I think you're saying the same thing as what I am. If it's more complex than what you may think, the language should guard against it. If not, it should make it simple.
Rust, for example, is the only mainstream language where it isn't possible to read from a file handle after it's been closed. Doing so is a compilation failure. This is just a general invariant of "how to use files".
But you also don't need to think about allocating or deallocating memory in Rust. It does that fke you automatically, even though it's not GC.
JS can also be complicated when it tries to hide realities about the world. E.g. is a const array or object immutable? No, the pointer is. But pointers don't exist! /s
I mean, this is correct in many cases, unironically.
It should be one of the core purposes of a programming language to help humans to write the code they intend. If a language doesnt do that then it's bad.
Source? Really dislike all these unsubstantiated claims everywhere.