this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
102 points (100.0% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles (Moved to [email protected])

3333 readers
1 users here now

We have moved to:

[email protected]

ArchiveA community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm surprised they didn't just require manufacturers to install acceleration limiters and remote kill switches. Hopefully they never do.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I would 100% support electronic speed limiters and acceleration limiters on public roads.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And then when you need to accelerate to avoid an accident, there's not enough power and BLAMMO! Slow cars are dangerous cars.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

There are probably 1000x more situations where you accelerate into a crash, rather than out of one. Slow cars are safe cars.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Just chiming in to say I see your point. Slower cars allow for more reaction time, and therefore safer reactions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

if that was the law how would you enforce it in any meaningful way? People would overide/not have them.

Well we'd just force them! How!!?! Mechanically minded people mod cars everyday. Then police would have more reason to F with everyone at their pleasure. You would for sure need more surveillance from the state. Probably need more expensive proprietary anti-consumer tech inside the car you own.

Do you know why I pulled you over? Your car transponder isn't transmitting properly.

Do you see what you want unleashed?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

if that was the law how would you enforce it in any meaningful way?

Through the OEM. Wouldn't be hard to create a system that tracks location locally using GPS and electronically applies an according speed limit from a govt database

Acceleration is a simple matter of distance/time/time.

Mechanically minded people mod cars everyday.

People break all sorts of laws every day. It doesn't mean you don't bother making them.

Then police would have more reason to F with everyone at their pleasure.

Actually they'd have less, considering cars would be physically incapable of speeding.

You would for sure need more surveillance from the state. Probably need more expensive proprietary anti-consumer tech inside the car you own.

...for what?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Speed limiters on commercial trucks already exist. They could be applied to private cars too. Not sure why, on public roads, there is much of a reason to drive 100 miles per hour. Many cars can go beyond that.

I agree about a remote kill switch. That has too high a potential to be abused. A limiter though, one that was fixed and not variable based on anything, would be fine I think.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

No fucking thanks, man!