this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
261 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

67987 readers
5739 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (5 children)

You should have to actually validate your age to use social media and you should be required to be 18.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

How do you validate age over the internet?

A drawing of two dogs and a computer desk, with text. One dog is on the computer chair with it's paw on the keyboard. The dogs are looking at each other. The text reads: "On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog". looking

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

You have to go somewhere to register in person and then you have to do Face ID to log in.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Face ID, you are even more dystopian than I thought.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

People use their Face ID all day every day. What are you talking about? You don’t think Apple has all that data?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

There's a reason I don't use Apple products.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Bet you’re fine with using government IDs for porn sites as well. 🤦‍♂️

The internet was better when everyone was just a random username and people didn’t use their real names for everything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The execution is poor but I don’t se anything wrong with restricting kids from accessing porn. Especially violent porn. Some of the toxic and violent behavior men exhibit in society is due to porn.

Don’t let red and blue blind your better judgment. Think freely.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You need to understand privacy laws and understand it’s the fucking parents responsibility to protect their kids from things they don’t want them to see.

You are getting into the territory of thought policing and need to learn to think before using “your better judgment” to control other people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Why don’t we let kids into adult video stores or sex shops? We live in a digital world and it’s time to put the keyboard away if you can’t get with that. There is a solution whether your cave brain can handle it or not. Idk what it is yet, but it can be done effectively and as safely as you give away your info the people online today.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Or and hear me out, parents could parent their children! Monitor your children's internet, put the basic amount of effort into learning how to block websites, do some form of parenting and stop trying to be your kids friends.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Yes it’s called installing blockers on your children’s devices or controlling their access to the internet till an age that you personally are ok with your child accessing the internet. Teaching them critical thinking and internet literacy would go a long way as well.

How about instead of getting triggered that your corporate daddy isn’t nannying humanity, go out and put some effort into parenting your own children and teaching them better?

Do you even have kids or are you just getting offended?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Big businesses can afford that.. Will ya let smaller ones or hobbyists off the hook?

I ain't giving out my home address like it's a passport boarder crossing. How do I tell if the faceID given over the internet is from that person? Could be a dog.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

People who use age as a measure of intelligence are the proof that is doesn't work. ;)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Lmao, the article is literally talking about children under the age of 10

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yes dear, but if you take 2 minutes to understand how the threaded comment system works you will realize I was not talking about the article but replying to a specific comment who mentionned the age of "18" as some kind of cutoff date.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Well, your comment was generic of all ages. Not saying something along the lines of "16 year olds are intelligent enough to vote", which I would agree with.

We can just just lower the 18 to 16 and resume the same conversation. No need to be condescending, you're turning a misunderstanding into a disagreement

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Eeew why do you sound like a cunt?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Because I am one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

It doesn't have to (and shouldn't) be the social media company gathering that information but a third party verification system that doesn't save anything, just validates the age using a driver's license/form of ID. We can do this (we do it for military and veterans so companies can give them discounts) in the US already.

I can understand not wanting to give social media too much data on you, but honestly they probably already have it already. Especially on platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook.

If we're supposed to be protecting children (with all these stupid laws anyway), then let's actually do that instead of just pretending all these stupid restrictions we currently have actually work.

No, I don't think the cutoff should be 18 either but a parent or guardian being forced to validate a 14 year old's account for them might actually force them to engage with what their kid is doing online which I would consider a win.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It doesn’t have to (and shouldn’t) be the social media company gathering that information but a third party verification system that doesn’t save anything, just validates the age using a driver’s license/form of ID. We can do this (we do it for military and veterans so companies can give them discounts) in the US already.

Unless you have extremely strong laws around personal information, the financial incentive for any 3rd party to collect and sell that information will be too strong.

And if your 3rd party verifier is the government, then there will be equally strong pressure from law enforcement to collect that information.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

I don't disagree. These things are definitely all connected to one another and will fall short if we don't fix user privacy laws in general.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No I don't think we should give corpos access to even more identifying info about us. You have a kid YOU have the responytobtake care of them not me. If you believe a kid should be able to go on the internet without proper surveillance it's on you if something happens to that kid not me. I would not give my kids a blank plane ticket to go anywhere they want in the world without surveillance, it's the same for the internet. It's not my responsibility to secure your kid it's yours.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

U don’t have to do anything unless u work for the agency that is verifying age. Would you say the same about school shooters? Not your problem. Up to parents to stop their kids. Unfortunately, we allow anybody to create life as there are a lot of bad parents.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Your argument does not make sense. I defend my kid from school shooting by not living in the States. Don't give guns to deranged people and most of your problems with school shooting is solved.

I do not have to give my ID when I walk around a school.

Letting a kid roam on the internet is more like giving them blank plane tickets than sending them to school.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

it's not always about your kids. it's about the other kids that aren't being parented. that's why there are age restrictions for things like alcohol and guns.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Age restriction on cigarettes and alcohol is not for kids that are not parented but to prevent companies abusing kids to make more profit wich is why I say selling of internet connected devices and internet connection should be done to adults only. But don't force me to give companies all my personal data.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

That is a whole other problem, kids need to have a tutor, mabe instead of putting money on business that will leak our data just to put fake barriers on a site we should put that money into helping the kids that are left to their own devices.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nah I don't want corpos to have even more information on me than they already have.

It's time for people to finally accept again that you can't shield kids from anything, especially if it seems forbidden and interesting.

Also if you really wanted to pick a verification age you would have to go with 25+. 18 years old are just legal 17 years old and 20 years are barely out of school and don't have any experience about anything. 30+ years are stuck in the system and 65+ simply don't care anymore.

Actually raise the verification age to 99+. No wait just ban social media for everyone, it sucks and is unhealthy, go tough grass or something.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So don’t have an age restriction for tobacco, or alcohol or strip clubs either cuz you can’t shield kids from anything? Got it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nice strawman you got there, but we weren't talking about those topics.

The topic was social media, try to keep up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It’s absolutely relevant. Go back to your cave if you can’t understand that. It’s 2024. You have to think about digital restrictions the same way you think an out analog.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Do you know what the great thing about 2024 is? People actually understand that digital doesn't have the same restrictions as analog.

Applying those very same restrictions would be foolish seeing how it wouldn't work as well, or even at all.

Nuance is sometimes important in these topics, no matter how much you want to act like your bullshit argument actually holds any water for some overarching topic no one was talking about.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Do you know what the great thing about 2024 is? People actually understand that digital doesn't have the same restrictions as analog.

Applying those very same restrictions would be foolish seeing how it wouldn't work as well, or even at all.

Nuance is sometimes important in these topics, no matter how much you want to act like your bullshit argument actually holds any water for some overarching topic no one was talking about.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Just dont give internet connected devices to kids and your problems are solved. I would agree with company being forced to verify the age of a person before signing a internet contract. Don't give open access to internet to kids it's just like sending them anywhere in the world alone.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

right, just don't give kids cigarettes or guns and your problems are solved...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Put in a parental filter then. You are trying to ruin the accessibility of the internet. What is a person from another country going to do when they don't have a US ID or whichever country is trying this? The internet doesn't have regions and people will move on to seedier websites that aren't based in that country anymore. You can see that with the several states that banned porn without ID. Most porn sites are still available without ID and big names like Pornhub can easily be accessed with a VPN that kids are constantly being advertised about by YouTube ad-reads. Requiring ID won't make kids safer, it'll just make the internet a headache to use and a source of identity theft when websites get hacked.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Easy and cheap access to anonymous, private, libre, and freedom-respecting computing is the inaliable human right of all hackers and future hackers.

I shouldn't even need an email to sign up, why do you think I'm here?