this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
926 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

19771 readers
12 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (6 children)

But she wouldn’t have?

Before Netflix I wasn’t buying hundreds of DVDs per year. It doesn’t make sense to claim that use of a service, even a free one, constitutes “savings” based on hypothetical behavior where you would have bought all the content individually at list price.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I understand your argument but my rebuttal is a simple no.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago

That’s the thing, in a lot of cases you’d simply go without whether you wanted to or not. They use “savings” to illustrate how much it would have cost to buy all those books on their own, that’s it. They clearly wanted to read those books but they wouldn’t be able to afford them without a library. If they had the money to spend on them I’m sure they would have but they didn’t and that’s literally the whole point.

Not being able to afford something and not wanting that something are different and calling this “savings” is fine and makes complete sense.

Example: I’ve seen 1085 episodes of One Piece. Without Crunchyroll(and it’s low fees, compared to buying box sets I’d never rewatch) I’d never have been able to see all that content. I would have wanted to, but I couldn’t.

Or to mirror your own words more: Before Crunchyroll I never would have seen it as without the service to offer these savings I’d be shit out of luck.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Before Netflix

Before Netflix there were such obscure things called libraries.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I try not to. I worked there twice.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The first time was fun because I had a good manager and Netflix was still seen by them as the upstart and not a real competitor.

A couple of years later and things at a different location under a coke head manager made for a very different experience.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How does someone working at blockbuster afford a coke addiction?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Fencing stolen goods between our store and a GameStop that was run by a former district manager of Blockbuster, plus her husband was a cop.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's just semantics.

"Save" often just means receiving whatever value free of charge.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’ve not seen it used that way

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

I prefer to buy books to own. But books are expensive, so if a particular book feels like it's not something worth the money to keep, I just borrow it from the library instead. That's literally money saved for me. Yeah, you could argue that if the library wouldn't have been an option then maybe I wouldn't have bought the book at all, so no difference there, but it's still the difference between reading the book for free or not reading the book at all.