this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
297 points (100.0% liked)

News

28731 readers
4473 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When Sarah Harris went in for surgery to remove her wisdom teeth in the summer of 2020, she must have thought she was in good hands. The oral surgeon she chose, Dr. James Ryan, had years of training, a good reputation and a thriving practice near her Washington, D.C.-area home. As a new patient at 23, she may never have dreamed he'd allegedly watched her when she was just 14. And Ryan would do more than take out Sarah's teeth. Her family says he would take her self-control and eventually take her life.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Dude is a manipulative creep. He spent years stalking her, love-and-money-bombed her and her family to get her affection, then used drugs to control her until they killed her.

If you think anything he did is remotely normal, I feel sorry for the women in your life.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

No… he didn’t. He met her at 23. The mother claimed he had seen her before. But there is no timeline of events. She wasn’t 14 working at a restaurant. Also, the mother was totally cool with them dating…. Which is why she went with them as a group on vacation and was having drinks on his dime.

You need to take a breath and read that article again with the understanding that most of it is hearsay, and the writer is purposefully trying to cast him as a child molester when nothing actually points to that besides the vague comments from the mother.

But yes, he did provide the drugs that killed her, and was most likely present when they were administered, and he should be punished for manslaughter.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Can you help me understand love-and-money-bombed?

That sounds kinda great compared to my 20s, in which I had no love nor money and was ultimately miserable and lonely.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm struggling.

This sounds like the start of most relationships.

Perhaps separated by degree, but mostly the wealth imbalance.

Right 50 year old showers young desirable woman with gifts, hardly uncommon.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In this case it is not a normal relationship. The person who is love bombing is not being genuine. They are manipulating someone to get what they want.

50 year olds pursuing 20 year olds is not common and definitely is creepy when it happens.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's subjective.

If you have a narrow definition of a "normal relationship" then sure, anything else is creepy and weird and someone must be manipulating someone.

I'm sorry to inform you that there are a great many 50 year olds who would absolutely party with 23 year olds given the means. In fact I would suggest that almost all sexually active 50 year olds, who are free of romantic entanglement would knock on that door. Fewer would be interested in setting up a long term committed relationship, but still a significant portion. Bars and brothels and strip clubs are full to the brim with these "abnormals" every night of the week.

Actually, there are a great many cultures in which this type of age disparity is the norm. I'm certainly not arguing that it's ideal or even "better" than your definition of a "normal relationship", just demonstrating that your views are indeed subjective.

It's really only creepy if the 23 year old doesn't appreciate the attention, or doesn't reciprocate, or is manipulated.

Yes it would be possible for a 50 year old to manipulate a 23 year old with lavish gifts. It's also possible for a 23 year old to manipulate a 23 year old with lavish gifts. It's also possible for a 23 year old to manipulate a 50 year old into giving them lavish gifts. It's also possible for a 50 year old to simply want to impress the object of his desires with nice things.

It's absolutely fine for you to find the age disparity creepy. It's also absolutely fine for others to engage in this type of relationship.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It is not really subjective. A fifty year old pursuing someone who is less than half their age is the very definition of creepy. I get you are playing devil's advocate here cause "love exists" no matter what the age.

Well here is a ugly wake up call, most 50 year olds would certainly turn down being pursued by someone half their age. Most 50 year olds are not pursuing someone who could be younger than their kids.

I get it, you are the kind of guy who would fuck his daughter's friend. You might not have kids and are lacking the perspective that it is basically sleeping with a child. You might just be some creep who likes to manipulate someone much younger than you.

Whatever it is, I am here to tell you that most people think it is creepy and unacceptable. How many healthy relationships have you seen with this age gap in your lifetime? This is probably some kind of fantasy you have that you are trying to justify here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ugh. The ad hominem is childish.

What you or "most people" think is creepy is irrelevant, because that's the very definition of subjective.

You're absolutely entitled to make judgements about age discrepancies in other peoples relationships if you wish, but labeling them evil or manipulative or criminal on that basis is presumptive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Just trying to make it clear to you when you in your fifties and pursue a 23 year woman that people are going to judge you for it. This isn't me, it is society. And for good reason.

The only thing childish here is your devil's advocate nonsense. I am not going to play pretend fantasy with you and sugar coat the reality that most men that age chasing young tail are disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I'm not advocating for the devil, I'm merely skeptical about this advertorial for a docudrama.

If you want to continue believing that 50 year olds don't find 23 year olds attractive, then more power to you.