this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
1133 points (100.0% liked)

News

30691 readers
3689 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kamala Harris’s running mate urges popular vote system but campaign says issue is not part of Democrats’ agenda

Tim Walz, the Democratic vice-presidential nominee, has called for the electoral college system of electing US presidents to be abolished and replaced with a popular vote principle, as operates in most democracies.

His comments – to an audience of party fundraisers – chime with the sentiments of a majority of American voters but risk destabilising the campaign of Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential candidate, who has not adopted a position on the matter, despite having previously voiced similar views.

"I think all of us know, the electoral college needs to go," Walz told donors at a gathering at the home of the California governor, Gavin Newsom. "We need a national popular vote. We need to be able to go into York, Pennsylvania, and win. We need to be in western Wisconsin and win. We need to be in Reno, Nevada, and win."


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Agreed with everything except getting rid of ec, increasing the minimum wage, and taxing the fuck out of corps for an arbitrary profit margin.

But damn. Solid otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What possible reason do you have for wanting to keep such an incredibly shit voting system? Please elaborate.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Because it’s not ‘incredibly shit’ it’s just not what you want it to be. It was designed to not allow mob rule. And it’s done a pretty good job at it.

Just because something doesn’t do what you want it to do doesn’t mean it’s bad.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"Mob rule" in this case being...the will of the majority of voters? Some sort of national popular vote, perhaps?

This is an insane take man, but I guess some puppets don't want their strings cut.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

“Insane take” Literally the founding of our country was built off that take.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, you're right, better to stay stagnant and not bother improving the system so that America stays true to its heritage. Everything was better back then, workers rights, women's rights, slavery...gods the founding fathers really knew their shit. Why try to improve on perfection?

(MASSIVE /s so I don't get downvoted to oblivion)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If any idiot here can’t tell your being sarcastic, that’s their issue.

But yes actually. Some things shouldn’t change. From what I’ve studied/learned we really were the first of our style of government. It’s been successful thus far, when plenty of other systems have come and gone.

Also just because the core of our system shouldn’t be changed doesn’t mean other things should/couldnt/havent changed. Soooo don’t put words in my mouth 👍

You said it best, why try to improve on perfection?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

It’s been successful thus far, when plenty of other systems have come and gone.

https://act.represent.us/sign/problempoll-fba/

lol, lmao even

The united states is a failure.

[–] Squirrelanna 15 points 8 months ago

The electoral college is just DEI legislation for Rebublicans since they can't win by popularity.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-10-02-0065

There was one difficulty however of a serious nature attending an immediate choice by the people. The right of suffrage was much more diffusive in the Northern than the Southern States; and the latter could have no influence in the election on the score of the Negroes. The substitution of electors obviated this difficulty and seemed on the whole to be liable to fewest objections.

It was designed solely to allow southern states to launder the votes of their slaves, as explicitly said by James madison, the person who put it in place.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Not to southerners, because they didn't let slaves vote, even though they still wanted to vote on their behalf.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They only counted for 3/5 of a person and were not allowed to vote

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

That was indeed the compromise.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

3/5 dk what the rest was. Gods, in my estimation, to survive and thrive.

Edited because I'm on my first coffee.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

If you exclude 2004 with Bush Jr (wartime president which all but guarantees reelection) the Republicans haven’t won a popular vote since 1988.

Seems more like the EC ensures minority rule.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It was designed to not allow mob rule.

And it flat our fails at that. Under the EC, we have a 'mob rule' by the swing states. And candidates basically only ever visit the cities of swing states, and solidly red/blue areas for fundraising on occasion.

One person, one vote. We are all born equal, so to should our votes be equal. Anything less is a failure of a system.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, I get it. You don't like democracy.

That's fine, just own it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

No, I get it. You don’t know how to have a discussion in which you disagree with the person and default to dismissing them completely instead.

That’s fine, just own it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

No you're coming across as white privilege who wants to keep that. It's not nice, cool or * admirable in any way, form or shape.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Damn now talking like normal people is privilege. No wonder everyone else is fucking crazy.

And also thanks for commenting on all my comments. Love you

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's not normal. It's sick and selfish. And I say that yes, with love for you and my homeland. It's not hate to want my neighbor in the hospital on life support to get well, but it may be selfish if they don't fully recover. It's not hate to want my alcoholic family members to get well. It's not hate to want my diabetic neighbors to check their blood sugar and help find them affordable insulin. And it's not crazy to expect my fellow citizens to not be sociopathic, fearful, or accept a false scarcity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I’m sick?I don’t love my neighbor? You think you can talk to me like I’m a monster?

Not getting rid of ec :: because I believe that it’s too easy to sway public opinion one way or another and there should be protections in place for communities that are smaller than say, NYC. 

Not increasing the minimum wage :: because I believe that this will cause our already rising cost of living to increase faster. 

Not taxing the fuck out of corps for an arbitrary profit margin :: because that’s a persons entire life. That could be you. It could be my son. It could be the girl at the local mosque who was raised in foster care and worked her ass off to become successful. And then some little ant online thinks it’s okay to tax the fuck outta her just because she’s done something with her life. 

PLEASE. I’m begging you please tell my how I’m the monster.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'd start with a simple arrogant misunderstanding of the definition of the word democracy wherein you leaned in to that arrogance telling me I didn't know how to converse with people. Your conversational style has brought -- due -- hatred.

You haven't a leg to stand on at this point as far as most reading are concerned, and it's through your own words we've all mostly come to the same conclusion.

Usually, not always, but usually, when everyone thinks you suck but you, its...

Again, usually

Usually it's you.

Food for thought.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Holy Mary, Joseph and Jesus, overdramatize and wallow in self-victimization, won't you? I did not call you a monster. I will not dehumanize very, very human behavior. It's distasteful, even foul, but it is human.

You would give the masters everything while insisting wage slaves continue to beg for scraps. There are other, more effective options. You might search some up and stop being so fragile long enough to do so. Not Breitbart or ONN either. Neither CNN nor even MSN. Go left. Global left.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So why don't you want one wage earned to be able to support their entire family or corporations to pay their fair share so we all call have quality health and education? The EC is rubbish, btw.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

It’s pretty simple really. Raising the minimum wage will cause inflation to everything else to balance out and we will be right back where we started. People can’t afford anything. But now with even higher and overly inflated prices.

That’s just how economics works. None of that trickle down bs or any other partisan view.

Simple cause and effect, and scarcity.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not if you're also taking care of monopolies and lowering the barrier to entry in a way that creates meaningful competition.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah man I’m all for killing monopolies. Hasn’t happened, won’t happen. Money drives the world, those monopolies are spending a considerable amount of their time and money lobbying the gov to make it so they can make MORE money, not less.

Now. If we also get rid of lobbying and make it a federal offense or treason to manipulate the legislative branch for monetary incentives, we got something.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'd imagine there's a lot more we agree on. We just don't agree on solutions. We've been so used to our invisible cages, we can't imagine the world beyond them without coaching, coaxing and encouragement, but it can be done.

Eta and in this instance, I agree with your solution.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Corporate greed is why no one can afford anything. There's no scarcity either. It's a matter of logistics, but that's going to quickly change if the very well off people and corporations don't curb their insatiable appetites, and that can be done with the 50s era 93% tax rates on very high individual earners and adding that same rate to megacorporations. No more tax cuts for donating to self-serving, self -directed "philanthropic" causes anymore, either. That tax money can be used to clean up the environment, well - feed, educate, home and health for EVERY individual at the same providers. No campaign donations of any form, fashion or sort. Campaigns are debates and past voting history, only, and every broadcast radio station and television station will be required to air them multiple times. Every print newspaper too, and taxes can fund that. No corporate or wealthy lobbiests.

Then let's see how charitable the wealthy really are.