this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
761 points (100.0% liked)

You Should Know

37340 readers
34 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google is weakening ad blockers as part of their MV3 extension standard and this will trickle down into all Chromium browsers. Built in ad blockers lack features compared to uBlock Origin as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Unfortunately, firefox is becoming just as bad as chrome.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Mozilla is now focusing on the advertising business.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

To reduce reliance on Google... With the goal to change how advertising works, less annoying, less asshole ads would benefit everyone.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It's not my browser's job to report to advertisers, period.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Its not doing that, you can use a fork if you want, or, and that would be the important part, put a condom over your internet cable before it enters the router, safety first.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Why are you talking about things you don't fully understand?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Please put a condom on your ethernet cables

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Trump level of confidence right here

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Its not doing that

It literally is, with an opt-out feature.

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/privacy-preserving-attribution?as=u&utm_source=inproduct

Your lack of concern is not relevant to the desires of other users.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The data doesn't go to the advertiser - it's anonymized, encrypted, and sent to an aggregation service. The data isn't about you personally.

This is a much better solution than what's used for advertising today.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Where’s it go after aggregation? To advertisers.

I don’t care if it is better than the creepy shit advertisers do today because it doesn’t stop advertisers from continuing to do creepy shit.

All it does it give advertisers MORE data. It isn’t a replacement it is an addition.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The advertiser doesn't get your data directly. The data is aggregated using differential privacy so it's impossible for them to see any individual's data.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don’t care. There is zero benefit to me. Advertising scum can go kick rocks.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Would you rather pay for every site you use? Not every site can afford to have someone else cover the cost for you (which is how Lemmy servers are ran for example), and the only other business models that have worked online are either running ads, or getting users to pay for access.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Good luck using the internet without having that data harvested by waaaaaay worse people. Again, just opt out.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Mozilla is mostly funded by google. With the current cookie laws from the eu to try and stop user tracking, they developed a new solution together.

Both chrome and firefox analyze your behaviour on your pc/phone/device. Then instead of giving websites the right ads, your browser tells every website you visit (with such ads) about you. You can google "privacy sandbox" if you'd like to know more.

So you better not be gay in a place like iraq, and be in need of using your school's website on a personal computer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Hey, you dropped your nose.

🤡

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Unfortunately, your statement probably only deserves bothsides.jxl. Please attempt to honestly and objectively compare things, despite the personal inconvenience.

They make mistakes, but Firefox and Mozilla are obviously nowhere near as fucked up as Chrome and Google by any measure. And Firefox would only improve if people stopped running back to Chrome when something was not perfect.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

As for that context you're missing, I'm counting them as equally bad because they run the same privacy violating approach to tracking user data and putting it where it shouldn't go

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Maybe actually read or ask for context. I didn't include it in the comment because I figured that people who care enough to ask would ask

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Pretend privacy or anti privacy

I'd say they both are bad except pretend privacy is much worse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Unfortunate that people are fooled by Mozilla's pretend privacy promises.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It's not like we have great options here. Safari isn't supported on Windows or Linux. Opera has its own issues (like predatory loan apps) even if you're willing to pay for it. Crossing my fingers that Ladybird will work out, but it has a long way to go (though it did better than I thought it would when I tried it a few months back). Everything else is some variant of Chrome.

If you need to be on the web at all, Firefox still seems like the best of the shit pile.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

There's also the Firefox forks like Zen and Floorp. It's still early days for Zen, but it's looking promising.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Not just that, not everyone who was listed in their open letters apparently agreed to or knew they were in them