this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
1827 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

7805 readers
3151 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 122 points 5 months ago (3 children)

They've attacked the fact she's a childless woman plenty. Like if it mattered for her policies. I doubt they'll straight up attack her for just being a woman much because they still want the conservative woman vote but they'll sure as shit attack her for woman things.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago

Hey, that lady hasn't had kids. I haven't had kids, but that's ok because I'm a man. Fuck that bitch, she doesn't have kids, she can't be an american. /s

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They’ve attacked her because she doesn’t have any biological children, not because she’s a woman. Although they may be related, the attacks were very specifically against her, not having any biological children.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because they talk about men not having kids all the time...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They certainly make it as difficult as possible for game to adopt children.

Stop trying to make this simple and black-and-white as they want you to think it is. They’re playing into their bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What?

Nobody has ever called out a male politician for not having kids. Attacking her for not having kids is literally exclusively about gender.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nobody has ever called out a male politician for not having kids.

You don’t know that. And if you’re claiming that’s a fact, then prove it.

When you have to invent things just to make your point, you can’t have a very good point.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

So you admit your claim is nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 months ago

no, they are saying you are an idiot. you not getting that is another proof.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How do you go about proving a lack of evidence? If I claim that there are no bears living on the moon, and you demand proof, how can I possibly provide sufficient proof of a lack of bears?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’m not the one who made the ridiculous claim, so proving it isn’t my problem. Why don’t you take it up with the person who made it?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You truly aren't understanding why your position is nonsensical, and that's hilarious to me.

In my example, if you were to disagree with the claim that bears aren't living on the moon, then the only way to prove one way or the other is to show evidence that bears do live on the moon. That's not my claim, so I'm not charged with finding evidence that bears live on the moon. If you want my proof that they don't, my proof is that there is no evidence that bears do live on the moon. There's no reason to believe that they do. That's as far as a null can be proven. Just look at all the following evidence I've found in all my long searching for evidence of bears living on the moon:

...

Convinced?

For the actual argument here, the claim is that nobody criticize male politicians for not having children. You said prove that nobody has done that. Well, there's no reporting of that criticism, so what, you want a link that goes to 404: page not found? To discredit that claim, you need to prove the negative; find a criticism of a male politician for not having children. If you can't find it, then you haven't refuted the claim.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)
  1. Not the person who made the claim.
  2. How is someone supposed to prove "none exist"? Its idiotic.
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yes, that was an idiotic claim for them to make.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

Please explain how someone would prove that it doesn't exist.

We will all wait with bated breath for what will surely be a very informing answer. The stage is all yours.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago

All you need is one counter-example, dumbass.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think what he is saying is sexism is at play much less than tribalism.

I dont think any sane person can say that sexism is not at play at all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

That's fair enough. Really it's a travesty at all that we have to rank what's being attacked, especially when it has nothing to do with policy.