907
this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
907 points (100.0% liked)
Political Weirdos
1007 readers
185 users here now
A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.
- Focus on weird behaviors and beliefs
- Follow Iemmy.world TOS
- Don’t be a jerk
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Probably kiddie porn.
Or doesn't know the meaning of concubines. Begging the question what _did_he mean?
"I eat pieces of shit like you for breakfast"
You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?
I’m guessing he thought it was a fancy term for slaves. Which is wrong in a lot of ways, but also just weird..
It’s the best read of it I can manage though..
Nah bro. He’s just copped to tryna fuck kids. Just republican shit.
I bet he was being polite and he actually wanted to write "you would be my bitches". Not polite, MAGA polite.
I don't know the meaning of that word either, but based on context I assume it's because I'm not into any sketchy shit.
It's the step between mistress and partner.
Oh.......yeah, I was thinking it was much darker. It sounds like some kind of metalic tub that you put children in to rape them in the fields of Alaska at an oil rig job.
At least with mistress's and partners consent is a key factor.
In several countries, and absolutely historically, it’s actually been a government-classified relationship status.
It just means people involved in a romantic and sexual relationship who are unwilling or unable to legally marry for whatever reason (because they are already married, because they aren’t legally qualified, such as one member is from a slave caste, etc)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concubinage
It's an old term for a pleasure slave.
No, concubinage was typically consensual.
By definition of concubine, sure, but consensual is a far cry for most. I'm trying to remember the exact quote, but I'll paraphrase it here: 'In slave-owning societies, the vast majority of concubines were slaves.' https://archive.org/details/historicaldictio0000klei for the source.
Historically consent has often been quite optional, when it comes to marriage, concubinage, and the like...
You're right. It doesn't make logical sense.
Oh, I meant you. You just tried to read a tweet where a republican just admitted to being a pedo, and your first instinct was to try to follow the logic.
That corse of action doesn't make logical sense!
Isn't it though?