Science Memes

15589 readers

765 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1634

flouride (mander.xyz)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

275 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 122 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Yeah, by this argument lead in the water isn't a concern.

[–] [email protected] 112 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You just made me mad by helping me realize that the Trump bros are going to break water by removing fluoride long before they fix water by removing lead.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Removing fluoride won’t break the water. However, it may break our teeth.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

They like the lead, though!

(Probably. I mean, they did in Flint, MI...)

[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but lead bioaccumulates where as fluoride/ine doesn't

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Are you sure fluoride doesn't? It does accumulate in the soil, building up in crops. Considering fluoride exposure from all sources, many people are above upper safe limits, even from tea drinking alone

I don't think fluoride should be added to water as it just pollutes the environment, where 99.99% of water isn't coming in contact with teeth

[–] [email protected] 37 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't. This is high-school chemistry.

Fluoride only "accumulates" up to the peak concentration of the environment (no further) on places where it is removed from contact with that environment.

You can only accumulate fluoride in the soil if you keep adding it and there is almost no rain to wash it away.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Like how crops are irrigated with town water, and in many areas with lowering rainfall? Accumulates in fruit, vegetables, leaves too

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

Yes, irrigation with the minimum possible amount of water is known to destroy land for millennia at this point. But sodium will be a problem way before you notice any change in fluoride.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

Yup, same with PFAS and forever chemicals. Maybe I'm ignorant because I'm not a doctor, but I don't know if this line of thinking holds water - pun not intended.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

lead poisoning becomes evident pretty early though doesn't it? (With respect to kids)

I would think that the ratio of persistent exposure to unsafe level has got to be easily higher in cases like Flint than any fluoride-in-the-water usage. Just speculation on my part.

What measures are taken to avoid screwing up the dosage, anyone know? Maybe predilute so that an oops requires multiple buckets instead of vials?