this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
417 points (100.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

5344 readers
1 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Use alt text or image descriptions to allow greater accessibility


We require alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago (3 children)

just pointing out that this type of censorship goes hand in hand with attempting to defed/disaggregate .world from the more left wing lemmies.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Should I be moving my account to ml or other, then?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

If you want the best of both worlds, Midwest has access to both, though I do have to block quite a few .world comms because I can’t stand the users’ ~~irrational hatred of~~ obsession with dunking on leftists (edit: and pearl clutching).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Yikes! I’m a leftie myself and I haven’t been on this platform enough to notice. Definitely moving.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Lemmy.ml is good if you want access to close to everything on the Leftist side of Lemmy. If I were you, though, I would browse the main Leftist instances like Hexbear, Grad, lemmy.ml, etc locally and pick which one has a good local and good all feed.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

ml still has access to hexbear/grad and .world so it's my preferred instance just so I don't need to account switch just to browse the different perspectives

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Alright sold, thanks

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Edit: oops wrong comment.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

My canary in the coal mine was seeing world defederate from the biggest piracy community on lemmy. Noped out right there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Way too pro-establishment for me

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I assume you mean the ML and Hexbears, who are dedicated to the fall of the west at any cost, including lives.

So, I can understand how people wouldn’t want to be federated with that sort of parlor pink bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

parlor pink

dedicated to the fall of the west at any cost, including lives

Hadn't heard that euphemism before, but it seems a weird accusation to levvy when the existing western order is already built on a huge mountain of lives, costing more and more each year.

If anything it's "leftists" rejecting (and censoring discussion in support of) the idea that violence at some level is going to be necessary who are the ones who would be the "parlor pink"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Say something bad about the CCP.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't like how they've taken a turn toward liberalizing and "opening up" their healthcare industry so vultures like the guy who got today can get even wealthier off of everyone else.

Maybe there's some logic to it, but I think it sucks.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

And would you agree that by enabling people to become billionaires makes them quite the opposite of communist? Almost like everyone at the top in every country is the actual problem?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

And would you agree that by enabling people to become billionaires makes them quite the opposite of communist?

I will say, they have at least as st made a show of keeping a leash on them so far, executing ones for corruption/embezzlement is good, I think these types of things are a continuum, if they allow the capitalists they're attempting to instrumentalize to actually solidify political power within the country I would agree that anything they reach could never be called communism. That's why I think it's sort of a Faustian bargain.

Almost like everyone at the top in every country is the actual problem?

This last decade has made me acutely aware of this point, regime change begins at home.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Those executions are just for show. And change will only happen at the end of a blade… but pointing up, not down to the people. That includes the people of the west.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How can execution of billionaires be "for show?" Are they supporting billionaires, or killing the ones that step out of line? Which is it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Typical Wumao.

You can’t have billionaires and be communist. End of discussion.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (12 children)

Is Engels "wumao?"

Question 17 : Will it be possible to abolish private property at one stroke?

Answer : No, no more than the existing productive forces can at one stroke be multiplied to the extent necessary for the creation of a communal society. Hence, the proletarian revolution, which in all probability is approaching, will be able gradually to transform existing society and abolish private property only when the necessary means of production have been created in sufficient quantity.

Do you think the PRC can summon more developed productive forces with the swish and flick of a wand? The entire purpose of Scientific Socialism is analyzing that markets and public ownership are both tools, and each is more or less effective at different points in development. Half the PRC's economy is in the public sector, governing industries like steel, infrastructure, energy, etc, which all place reliance on the public sector from the private sector, which is not as developed and generally governs more complex industries at lower levels of development.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

No, the CPC's usage of a Socialist Market Ecnomy is in line with the Marxist stance that markets and public ownership are more effective in different sectors with respect to level of development. Per Engels:

Question 17 : Will it be possible to abolish private property at one stroke?

Answer : No, no more than the existing productive forces can at one stroke be multiplied to the extent necessary for the creation of a communal society. Hence, the proletarian revolution, which in all probability is approaching, will be able gradually to transform existing society and abolish private property only when the necessary means of production have been created in sufficient quantity.

The Proletariat wrests Captial by the degree to which it has developed, which is necessarily different in different sectors and industries, and not merely by decree. The goal is full public ownership and central planning, but until that becomes practical across the entire economy, focusing on the principle sectors, ie the steel industry, infrastructure, and so forth that the Private Sector relies on allows humans to have dominance over Capital, and not the reverse. Half of the PRC's economy is in the Public Sector, and nearly a tenth in the cooperative sector.

You don't have to blindly support the PRC, but it absolutely is Socialist.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Typical Wumao response.

You can’t have billionaires and be communism. That’s not fair to the people, which is the point.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In what manner is Engels "wumao?" Marxism is not about "fairness," or "justice," but liberation of the working class. It's about rapidly improving the lives of the Proletariat. The notion that private property can be abolished with one stroke is anti-Marxist, and that means the idea that the bourgeoisie and thus billionaires can be abolished at one stroke is also anti-Marxist. The CPC is increasing control over the Private Sector and gradually wresting Capital from the Bourgeoisie, precisely as Marx and Engels envisioned a Socialist State would.

You can't just uncritically label everything you disagree with as "wumao."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You can’t liberate the fucking working class when you’re allowing someone to make the billions of dollars that should be going to the working class. China is a fucking hypocritical country and you are programmed by them. Goooodbye Wumao

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (14 children)

Can you explain how an American managed to be "programmed" by the PRC despite not speaking any mandarin? Is the PRC that powerful? Again, I point you to Marx:

The essential condition for the existence, and for the sway of the bourgeois class, is the formation and augmentation of capital; the condition for capital is wage-labour. Wage-labour rests exclusively on competition between the labourers. The advance of industry, whose involuntary promoter is the bourgeoisie, replaces the isolation of the labourers, due to competition, by their revolutionary combination, due to association. The development of Modern Industry, therefore, cuts from under its feet the very foundation on which the bourgeoisie produces and appropriates products. What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable.

Markets centralize and lay the foundations for public ownership and central planning. You can't wave a wand and command these internal mechanisms for planning to spring out of thin air.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

You're right! Let's defend Russia instead!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

hexbear/grad

Lol, authoritarians aren't left wing (and if you think tankies aren't manipulated by just as large a government operation, you're being wilfully ignorant. It coming from a non-American government doesn't make it any better)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

All revolutions are going to be authoritarian, the extent of that really is a reflection of how dire the conditions have been.

I don't take their reporting at face value any more than I do the stuff that comes from western media. I just don't see how it helps any sort revolutionary change happen in America to have every speech platform moderated directly by the government.