this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
403 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68772 readers
5616 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 78 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Community notes are an actually good feature of Twitter. It's a good thing they are copying it

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago (3 children)

why is that? genuine question, don't use twitter.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's broad consensus that's featured there, so it manufactures consent less hard, and more importantly, the fact-check appears attaches to the original misinfo, so it gets reshared with it.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

but broad consensus does not mean true.

to me this just sounds like social media passing the buck to their users with no regard for accuracy. sure, whatever you guys want to believe, go for it.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think you and the person you're responding to both have a point. They're totally passing the buck to their users, but their users will probably be better at putting accurate information than they are. It's a different set of problems to be sure, but I think it's a preferable one

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

but their users will probably be better at putting accurate information than they are.

"they" (Meta) was not the one fact-checking, it was a 3rd party service. And I don't know why you assume a social media user base would be better at it, especially with highly politicized things like climate change, vaccines, wars, etc.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

to me this just sounds like social media passing the buck to their users with no regard for accuracy.

And for free, no less!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

like social media passing the buck to their users with no regard for accuracy.

Lol this is the whole idea of the social networks - outsourcing of the work to the users (or "useds" as Stallman calls them). This used to be called "web 2.0". In other news, this also highlights one of the shortcomings behind the idea of democracy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

What does Facebook have now, a monarchy? Their moderators are way worse than Twitter fact-checking ever was.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And a tweet with a CN attached cannot be monetized.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Tweets can be monetised? I only know Twitter from screenshots.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

It's like YouTube, you can chose to show ads.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Crowd sourced fact checking so they don’t have to pay staff to do it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Instead the "community" can brigade the "verification" and create an even louder echo chamber.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Lemmy is also an echo chamber buddy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Indeed. People are going to have to work hard to constantly be tackling misinformation like on X.

However it does present an opportunity. Perhaps a taste of their own medicine…

Post misinformation about the CEOs and the like, like I’ve seen a few articles recently about Zucc having sexual issues. Community notes could say it’s true if there’s enough votes or submissions or whatever 🤣

Or like https://lemmy.world/post/24021828

If it’s about the CEOs we can digitally “luigi” them

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's better because people can post notes under the nonstop nazi propaganda. \s

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Community notes are an actually good feature of Twitter.

they're really not; they're just a way to harass marginalized people.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's not true, why do you lie? The community notes I have seen are very reasonable and are not used to harass people but rather to correct lies or misleading information

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

try existing as a trans person online. community notes only works when your userbase isn't majority nazis. also it's not a substitute for ACTUAL moderation.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I have literally not seen a bad community note on twitter. Which isn't to say they don't exist, clearly you just see different posts from me. Though ime overall they seem to work better than the sorry excuse for moderation twitter had before, and it's pretty much the only change that piece of shit made that I consider positive. Well that and likes not being public.