1
If there was a foolproof way of checking for a pirated copy they wouldn't be making a game engine they'd be making DRM
People wanted PR responses, people get PR responses
I've always held the opinion that any celebrity or influencer or whatever is absolutely fucked up in some way. You just have to hope they're fucked in some way that is relatively harmless
- it's expensive to run, openAI is subsidising it heavily and it will come back to bite us in the ass soon
- it can be both intentionally and unintentionally biased
- the text it generates has a certain style to it that can be easy to pick up on
- it can mix made up information with real information
- it's a black box
I don't think that's what happened to the author. Cloudflare generally doesn't leave you on that page if it detects a suspicious browser. Plus, how is cloudflare supposed to use your corporate VPN and your certificate to verify your identity? They don't have an omnipotent view of all corporate VPNs that exist. The check that cloudflare does on that page is pretty javascript heavy and I assume it was just temporarily broken in Firefox. Which is an issue in itsself, but it's not the massive deal that the author makes out.
Is this not a privacy win though? Isn't this what people want?
The price, the line down the middle, the hinge. Generally just not requiring any more screen space
The article explains that this was basically a flaw in the way the law was written
The issue with that argument is... Why? He is a business man, activism generally doesn't effect him, tesla cars are generally liked by left leaning middle class, why would he spend so much money to destroy something?
Voat was born out of several questionable subs being banned from reddit so naturally the userbase was into very questionable things. That's why they failed so hard
view more: next ›
That's because they still think it's a good idea, they just thought that they could get away with it