[-] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago

I can also behave _my_self

[-] [email protected] 75 points 19 hours ago

Fucking CERN needs to hire this man, he created an entire sun in his kitchen. They've been trying to contain nuclear fusion for decades and my man does it by accident in a pastry.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 19 hours ago

They should be. But they aren't.
Which is especially egregious with the terrible investment in public transportation. You want poor people to stop speeding? Give them a decent alternative to cars.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 23 hours ago

Flat fines mean it's only a crime for the poor

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

God that reminds me of the end of this "Good Luck, Babe" parody

(Sorry its tiktok, I couldn't find it anywhere else but Instagram)

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If you have enough experience to make your own custom adventure for your players, I'd recommend that, so that you can easily adjust it to suit your players needs and preferences, as you go.

But if if you're not comfortable with that, then probably just use the campaign that comes with the d&d starter pack (lost mines of phandelver or something like that).
It's not an especially amazing campaign, but it has a decent mixture of dungeon crawling and roleplaying, and the story/encounters are simple enough for beginners to understand. It's a safe bet to ease players into TTRPG.

You could also try a totally different system. I hear good things about Blades in the Dark. I've never played it, but what I hear sounds like it avoids overwhelming new players.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Elevators exist to give enough time to load in the next floor.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Naw dog
He's an emo hedgehog

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

So you're saying that Wario is alternate universe shadow the hedgehog????

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Nobody is arguing that Freud was right.
They're explaining why Freud named it the Oedipus complex.

I agree with them. Just because Freud was wrong doesn't mean his reasoning for the naming wasn't consistent with his beliefs. He believed that the ignorance allowed Oedipus to express the internal desire that would otherwise be inhibited.

He was wrong, but that explains why he named it this way.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago

I mean, if you're serving over http, that is the port for it

82
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I cum in the shower, instead.

134
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Imagine living in a universe where, without even trying, you can run so fast that if you trip, you will die and splatter your body over a couple hundred meters of ground. And if you trip into someone, it'll kill them and possibly an entire pile of people.

Like, in motor racing, the cars get wrecked but the drivers are fine. In the movie Cars, they all die. The race spectators are watching a blood sport.

63
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

What is a bread roll if not all crust?
What is toasting, if not making the whole piece of bread more crust-like?

26
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

When toilets try to save money by reducing the amount of water they use per flush, but you end up having to flush like 3 times 🤬

115
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

What would you put in your second aid kit?

82
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Be me.
I've started sitting down to pee because it's cleaner.
Stand up after I've finished peeing.
Pull up pants.
Turn around to flush.
There is poop in the toilet.
I forgot that this time I had sat down to poop.

46
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

In old plays and stories, such as Romeo and Juliet, poisons are depicted as being fairly fast acting.

Would they really have had access to such poison, or was it simply creative license? What would a realistic depiction of a poison of that era be?

39
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I'm trying to figure out a ruling for something one of my players wants to do. They're invisible, but they took a couple of seemingly non-attack actions that my gut says should break inviz.

Specifically, they dumped out a flask of oil, and then used a tinderbox to light it on fire. Using a tinderbox isn't an attack, nor is emptying a flask, although they are actions , and the result of lighting something on fire both seems like an attack and something that would dispell inviz.

I know that as DM I can rule it however I want, but I'm fairly inexperienced and I don't wanna go nerfing one of my players tools just because it feels yucky to me personally without understanding the implications.

Is this an attack or is there another justification for breaking inviz that is there some RAW clause I didn't see? Or should this be allowed?

67
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
136
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
762
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I know I have small hands but c'mon. Flagship phones these days are strait up small tablets, not even what we'd have called on phablets 15 years ago.

I know it's what people buy, but I'm still sad that if I want a phone that small then I have to deal with camera and display a couple gens old

157
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

PeriodicallyPedantic

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago