PeriodicallyPedantic

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 37 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

No matter how much pasta you make, you're obligated to eat it in a single sitting.
This is the way.
This is the way I die.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I only see one title and one post body; what happens if 3 people share the same link but with 3 different titles and description bodies?

Do they get merged, does one get arbitrarily selected, or does this only work on posts with identical link+title+body?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

I'm pretty happy with Voyager. It's not perfect but it's good

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Can confirm. Grew up just down the road

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

I grew up just a few minutes down the road from there! Had a friend who lived on That street.

I love whenever I see this pop up every few months or lol.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

You can never trust Big Number.

They keep trying to make laws without going through Congress or the Senate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

But they were still users who were active in that half-year, so even when they went offline it shouldn't have resulted in a dip

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

This is a boomer ass take

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This graph doesn't make sense to me. The drops on the two graphs shouldn't line up, right? Make me sus

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a very reddit thing to say

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ah makes sense.

I wasn't even concerned about the low priority of passenger cars. I meant the physical condition of the track itself, and the resulting reduction in top speed along many section in the maritimes.

 

I'm trying to figure out a ruling for something one of my players wants to do. They're invisible, but they took a couple of seemingly non-attack actions that my gut says should break inviz.

Specifically, they dumped out a flask of oil, and then used a tinderbox to light it on fire. Using a tinderbox isn't an attack, nor is emptying a flask, although they are actions , and the result of lighting something on fire both seems like an attack and something that would dispell inviz.

I know that as DM I can rule it however I want, but I'm fairly inexperienced and I don't wanna go nerfing one of my players tools just because it feels yucky to me personally without understanding the implications.

Is this an attack or is there another justification for breaking inviz that is there some RAW clause I didn't see? Or should this be allowed?

 
 
 

I know I have small hands but c'mon. Flagship phones these days are strait up small tablets, not even what we'd have called on phablets 15 years ago.

I know it's what people buy, but I'm still sad that if I want a phone that small then I have to deal with camera and display a couple gens old

119
hmmm (lemmy.ca)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

That was quick

 

Ontario must never be forgiven for this

 

And Jamaican patty

120
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I can't stop listening to this.
I feel like I need to go play chess now. Idk if it's AI generated or not, but it's so catchy

 

Using copilot:

generate and image of Shrek opening a can of beans, but unexpectedly Mac & cheese flies out and lands on the donkey

Unholy union of ai memes

 

I remember everyone calling her androgynous at the time. Looking back, that was an absolutely wild thing for people to think.

view more: next ›