Finally people will no longer be confused with this Lemmy community and accidentally post here.

So I have seen comments that bitwardens extension works and want to check if no script does. Since libre wolf is just configuration I figure most stuff should work but not real sure. I looked to see if there was something like a pinned questions thread which I would normally put a minor question like this. Considering recent news maybe instead a moving from firefox pinned thread for awhile first.

Hello everyone,

Obligatory "I'm a recent Firefox refugee" header.

The migration went mostly fine, with one notable exception. I use LastPass as a password manager, so naturally I installed the extension. However, it does not show up in the address bar or in the overflow menu.

The autofill helper does show up on login forms, but clicking on the icon fails to open the LastPass login page. No errors except some cryptic stuff from a minified JS script.

I was surprised not to find anything about this online. Are there other LastPass users in here? What else can I do to help debugging?

Such a minor quibble that I'm almost embarrassed to mention it, but it would be nice to have these if possible.

I've migrated the search.json.mozl4 (I think?) file I had in my FF profile folder, which has quite a lot of custom search engines I've accumulated over the years, so that may have something to do with it, but I think the favicons might have been missing out of the box? Anyway, like I said, a minor quibble.

I believe LibreWolf's defaults are too strict and slow down adoption. Most options are either : all or nothing. No in-between.

Sadly, I believe the default settings are too strict and will slow down adoption by the mass, which would in term bring a better anonymity set.

It's not a great alternative to Firefox because LibreWolf is just not usable for the daily user: no DRM, no cookies, no history, websites that break... The browser should let the user choose:

• Maximum compatibility (more tracking)
• Mid-option (like a modded firefox but without the annoyances like cookies not being stored, having a fixed size, or forced light-mode/timezone)
• Best privacy (pretty much the current mode)

I find myself forced to edit the default settings which is a huge privacy/fingerprinting risk. If we create 'settings groups', yes, the privacy will be hurt, but at least we will be more in each group.

What do you think about this?

Appreciate your help please

Hi, recent firefox refugee here, and I'm trying to figure out how to get webgl fully working. I already disabled webgl.disabled in about:config, and that seems to have done the trick for most webgl content.

However, the site noclip.website doesn't work. It's basically a 3D model viewer for game maps, and all I get is a black screen. This site works fine in Firefox on this same machine.

I'm using LibreWorld 135.0.1-1 Flatpak on Linux

Thanks!

EDIT:

Here are the log messages in the console. No errors, just a bunch of WebGL warnings:

Object { root: {…} }
 
Object { gobj: (61) […] }
101.7935fc8f.js:3678:20568
Unimplemented object 016a 5 101.7935fc8f.js:3678:19280
WebGL warning: texStorage(Multisample)?: Requested size at this level is unsupported. 4
WebGL warning: clearBufferu?[fi]v: Framebuffer not complete. (status: 0x8cd6) COLOR_ATTACHMENT0: Attachment has no width or height.
WebGL warning: clearBufferu?[fi]v: Framebuffer must be complete.
WebGL warning: clearBufferu?[fi]v: Framebuffer not complete. (status: 0x8cd6) COLOR_ATTACHMENT0: Attachment has no width or height.
WebGL warning: clearBufferu?[fi]v: Framebuffer must be complete.
WebGL warning: clearBufferu?[fi]v: Framebuffer not complete. (status: 0x8cd6) COLOR_ATTACHMENT0: Attachment has no width or height.
WebGL warning: clearBufferu?[fi]v: Framebuffer must be complete.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer not complete. (status: 0x8cd6) COLOR_ATTACHMENT0: Attachment has no width or height.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer must be complete.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer not complete. (status: 0x8cd6) COLOR_ATTACHMENT0: Attachment has no width or height.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer must be complete.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer not complete. (status: 0x8cd6) COLOR_ATTACHMENT0: Attachment has no width or height.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer must be complete.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer not complete. (status: 0x8cd6) COLOR_ATTACHMENT0: Attachment has no width or height.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer must be complete.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer not complete. (status: 0x8cd6) COLOR_ATTACHMENT0: Attachment has no width or height.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer must be complete.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer not complete. (status: 0x8cd6) COLOR_ATTACHMENT0: Attachment has no width or height.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer must be complete.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer not complete. (status: 0x8cd6) COLOR_ATTACHMENT0: Attachment has no width or height.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer must be complete.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer not complete. (status: 0x8cd6) COLOR_ATTACHMENT0: Attachment has no width or height.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer must be complete.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer not complete. (status: 0x8cd6) COLOR_ATTACHMENT0: Attachment has no width or height.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer must be complete.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer not complete. (status: 0x8cd6) COLOR_ATTACHMENT0: Attachment has no width or height.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer must be complete.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer not complete. (status: 0x8cd6) COLOR_ATTACHMENT0: Attachment has no width or height.
WebGL warning: drawElementsInstanced: Framebuffer must be complete.
After reporting 32, no further warnings will be reported for this WebGL context.

I like when I can talk to the folks who design the tools I'm using. Thanks for being here!

@linuxmint ✅
@GrapheneOS ✅
@signalapp ✅
@keepassxc ✅
@Mojeek ✅
@mullvadnet. ✅
@Tutanota ✅
@librewolf ✅

Hi all

Trying to make a switch over to librewolf, but currently the "most mission critical issue" is that I can't seemingly force the PiP -videoplayer to stay on top of all other windows.

My kwin window rule is essentially identical, apart from window class, to the old one I used with Firefox - and that one worked just fine. Not sure if kwin, librewolf or user id10t issue.

But if anyone has thoughts or pointers about this, please share!

the settings as they are now:

edit: I absolutely hate this. IMMEDIATELY after posting I tinkered a bit and turns out "Match whole window class" = Yes -setting was the thing. It works now. DERRRRP.

So in case anyone else stumbles on the same issue, check that setting.

What happend if i use it , my data Is saf

Completed my migration from Firefox to @librewolf yesterday. @Mojeek is my search engine. I'm really happy with my new set up so far.

Since I've been mostly using #LibreWolf @librewolf and Tor Browser @torproject anyway, and almost never plain #Firefox, it wasn't a big deal to say goodbye and to delete Firefox from all devices today.

The new "Terms of Use" and the modified privacy notice have crossed a red line, I do no longer give Mozilla the benefit of doubt.

Brief and good summary of Mozilla's changes by @sarahjamielewis:

https://mastodon.social/@sarahjamielewis/114072293410465140

TBH I have no idea why somebody would so persistently and patiently work on discrediting and sinking their own flagship.

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/17370625

I've been a user of Librewolf for a about a year now, and it's always served me pretty well as a nice easy way to get a hardened Arkenfox Firefox.

However, recently I was curious why Librewolf wasn't recommended on PrivacyGuides, and took a look through their reasoning on their forum. That thread spans multiple years, and for the most part I thought their reasons for not including it were a bit unfair, especially after Librewolf started offering automatic updates.

But towards the end of that thread in October, a Privacy guide team member posted a link to the Arkenfox github issue tracker, where a Librewolf team member reveals how the project appeared to have lost steam after a critical member left, and they are struggling to keep it up to date with the latest Arkenfox updates, despite putting out new releases.

I'm not sure if those problems have been resolved since that time. One of the maintainers did mention they're still short staffed in this topic on taking over maintaining Mull.

After considering the arguments for and against in the PrivacyGuides thread, I think their conclusion for not recommending it was ultimately correct. Using Librewolf adds an additional layer of trust, not only to not be malicious (which I don't suspect they are) but to also be able to adequately fulfill what they set out to do reliably.

Another big part of them not recommending it was the existence of the Mullvad Browser, which I didn't realize was in fact a very well hardened version of Firefox (essentially the Tor browser without the Tor part), and is far more effective for private browsing compared to Librewolf or an Arkenfox'd firefox.

Ultimately you'll have to come to your own conclusion, but personally I'll be switching back to Firefox as my convenient daily browser full of addons, alongside the mullvad browser for (more) private browsing.

browser.tabs.insertAfterCurrent is a treasure inside about:config of Firefox (and LibreWolf for that matter). Instead of opening new tabs at the end, it opens them right next to the current tab so you can go back to the last tab instantly without scrolling through a long tab list! I believe this should be the default behaviour in every browser.

Unfortunately, too few users are aware it even exists.

I suggest you add this as a checkbox in the graphical about:preferences menu.

The link above says form history is disabled:

Disable search and form history.

Before I bother installing LibreWolf, I would like to know whether the form history can be activated manually. I think it is very helpful and saves time.

It is stored only locally anyway, so it doesn't violate privacy like telemetry and add-on signing to. If my data was stolen, I would have much greater things to worry about anyway.

I hope not. Add-on signing is a glorified backdoor. Not only does it let Mozilla remotely disable extensions, but in future, governments can force Mozilla to censor unwanted extensions.

In addition, it is a privacy violation, since Mozilla can see who has installed which add-on.

[…] when Firefox contacts Mozilla servers to verify if Mozilla approved each extension, it discloses to Mozilla which extensions are in use. So in addition to being a backdoor by definition, it is a severe privacy violation as well. This comes from an organization that perpetually claims to champion user freedom and privacy.

(source: change.org)

And let's not forget about a certain May 2019 incident:

all Firefox addons have been disabled due to an expired certificate. And so, people got silently hit with stuff like this when turning their "private and secure" browser on. It was only a matter of time until Mozilla's extension prison backfired, and it did so spectacularly. Though the BugZilla comments were already predictably closed, they will not be able to contain the armageddon this time, no matter how much PR they spew. The whole /r/firefox front page is filled with threads about this, with many people moving to Chrome-based browsers. Hacker News is also booming. Tech sites are running with the news too. The funny thing is, the whole point of the extension prison was allegedly to increase security - and yet today, all security addons got disabled because of it! Shows how freedom always has to trump over security or it ends up in a disaster like this.

(source: digdeeper.club)

Hey! Anyone encountered this issue, that you cannot screenshare on discord in librewolf? It shows loading forever on others screens (on mine I see it captures the screen just fine). If so, please let me know how to fix it, its pretty annoying. I'll add that sharing works well in ungoogled chromium. So I believe its just some flag that I have to turn on but I don't know which.

Howdy!

I recently started using LibreWolf (because there is no good Firefox package for Guix ATM). However, when I tried to install my standard extensions, I was redirected to the Mozzarella web page. I thought "fine, I'm a good GNU citizen" and installed a few extensions. But soon I realized that the were seriously outdated and also dysfunctional. For example, the Bitwarden extension is from July 2023.

Shouldn't LibreWolf stop sending users to Mozzarella if it's a dead project hosting outdated extensions, considering all the security issues that implies?

In Firefox, it works perfectly fine.

No matter, how I set up LibreWolf - it refuses to show the login part of the page, when trying to access a private instance.

Out of desperation, I enabled all tracking etc. possible, which I would find in the settings. Disabled HTTPS-only mode, HTTPS over DNS, etc. Nothing works.

Darn, and I just got Librewolf upgraded to 131.0, meaning needing to wait further for 131.0.2.

Is this total cookie protection something embedded, not requiring any user intervention? I know with librewolf we get the strict enhanced cookie protection mode, but I don't know if for this total protection there's something required, if not turned on by default...

Greetings !