this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
172 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68244 readers
4073 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gamoc@lemmy.world 87 points 11 months ago (4 children)

As if fifteen year olds are buying phones themselves. Discussing this was a waste of time even before you consider that parents need to do some parenting and social networks need some regulation.

[–] Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 11 months ago

Even if they have to pay it themselves, they can still ask their parents to buy/order it for them and just give them the money. That's what I did at that age anyway because ordering them online is cheaper and you have more choice.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Shhh, don't tell the out of touch politicians that teenagers are not exactly known for their care about if something is against the rules or not.

It is more fun to watch them be shocked on TV when they can't explain why their ideas don't work.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, parents aren't always able to do their parenting very well and need their own guidance.

[–] Gamoc@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Not overusing screens was a constant when I was a kid decades ago and it doesn't take a genius or even paying much attention to notice the effect it and social media has on kids.

[–] Spendrill@lemm.ee 54 points 11 months ago (2 children)

'Make it illegal' is always a cheaper option 'than spend money to implement a solution that will actually work.'

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 26 points 11 months ago

As a parent of kids that I don't want using smartphones just yet (oldest is 10), screw those reps. If my kids save up and buy a smartphone behind my back, that's on me for not earning their trust. If I'm such a bad parent that they feel the need to do that, they should have that right.

So screw these lawmakers. If they want to protect kids, they should teach parents how to be good parents, and teach the necessary stuff in schools.

[–] Little_mouse@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

Of course, "always cheaper" in this case means less money up front, but much, much expensive more down the road than the initial cost.

Of course, the down the road cost isn't usually that visibly connected to the "make it illegal" plan, so conservative governments love it.

[–] DrCake@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Are any under 16 buying the phones themselves? With the price of phones now I’d guess for the vast majority it is the parents themselves buy it for their kids.

At that point it’s for the parents to decide for themselves

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You can still buy perfectly good phones for 1-200€ but yeah the blame still mostly lies with the parents imo.

[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The "blame" lies with no one except for the big social media megacorporations that develop and distribute addictive apps. Phone use by teenagers, or anyone else, is not intrinsically connected to any adverse effects. Rather, negative health consequences for children are the result of an unchecked, raging hypercapitalism.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 11 months ago

Yes and no. I agree we should regulate these companies and make them partially responsible for the harm they cause, but you cant sue a knife company if your kid stabs someone. Its your responsibility to make sure your kids dont fall into the traps that exist in our world.

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

I think most of them get an older phone from their parents.

[–] macaroni1556@lemmy.ca 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Having a phone is an important part of participating in society like it or not. Not everyone has a happy home life of a home at all, and flatly banning anyone from owning a phone (purchased themselves) under 16 could further endanger young people already struggling in a dangerous situation. Or even just maintaining a job to survive.

Of course I don't want to live in a world where under 16s need to work, or need to discretely contact help, but we have to face reality. Let's fix that stuff rather than ban communication devices...

[–] deur@feddit.nl 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Te be fair, working in the coal mines was also an important part of participating in society.

[–] macaroni1556@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago

If only they banned sending mail and reading the newspaper we could have saved those kids.

(you missed the point of my comment)

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Or how about you legislate for parental controls on Smartphones.

You know, like how any desktop or laptop has them?

How are you going to enforce this law? Because parents will still buy their kids smartphones. Are you going to have the police arresting under 16s and confiscating their phones?

[–] adam@doomscroll.n8e.dev 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Apple has pretty robust parental controls on their devices.

Source: am technical enough to have set them up.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 17 points 11 months ago

So does Android.

It's just a moral panic, as usual.

Politicians love moral panic.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago

I like parents having the option, but I think the better option is to build actual trust with kids, not lock down their stuff and spy on them. Kids will find workarounds, so technical measures are merely a tool that should be used with restraint.

[–] sleen@lemmy.zip 5 points 11 months ago

Some laws have little to no thought put into. This is one of them. Not only is this unnecessary but it would create more technological waste.

[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

UK you're drunk, go home.

[–] aluminium@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

These guys live on an island.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago

I mean... literally...

[–] Hovenko@iusearchlinux.fyi 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Old mental people who have zero idea about modern world. What about investing into education and prevention?

[–] cuchilloc@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Lol who is downvoting you? I get that Lemmy is generally left-leaning but come on!! All drugs should be legal and taxed , all information should be free ! A phone is a cheaper computer! Stop giving more power to governments! Free the people! — edit before the downvotes come my way: why do I bring up drugs ? Politicians & police are also the ones benefiting from negotiating with dealers. Does not matter which country you live in.

[–] minimalfootprint@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 11 months ago

More and more aspects of life require an app or at least a smartphone (QR codes). That already excludes older people from some aspects of daily life. Let's do the same for kids!

Politicians should do their jobs and regulate tech and social media not ban useful devices.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 11 months ago

Power to young people. Politicians who propose things like this, may you lose all elections.

If you are a teenager, I am so sorry for my fellow adults who think we have any business deciding how you guys live your lives. I assure you we are not all like this.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Anyone else notice how insane expensive phones have gotten in the last couple of years?

[–] aluminium@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No? The spectrum just got way wider. you can still buy 150$ phone, no problemo, its just gonna be a piece of junk. But same was true 10 years.

Only thing that changed is that back in the day 300 - 400 phones gave you 90% of the experience of the 800 - 1000 phones. Thats different now.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well your second paragraph is the meat of what I mean. A $300 phone now is shit, whereas 5 years ago you could get a decent one. You gotta get to the $600+ (Canadian) to find anything that's decent now

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

I disagree. Motorola makes decent phones, and I've been rocking one I got for $50 ($250 retail) from Google Fi a few years ago.

[–] j4yt33@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago

NaNnY sTaTe!!1!11!!!