this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
213 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23300 readers
3382 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 102 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Let us hope that one day the US, or any democracy for that matter, will come together to implement ranked choice voting.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Until that day, let’s hope people recognize that there really are only two votes that will end up counting. I still regret voting for Nader when Bush stole the election in 2000.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let’s also hope that people realize voters who don’t vote far outnumber third-party voters.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

There should be some improved turnout in the 18-24 range now that abortion and marijuana are on the ballot in several states this November.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd settle for Democrats not taking advantage of the situation.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Democrats aren’t taking advantage, republicans are. Why do you think independent candidates are funded primarily by GOP PACs but use moderate platforms? They know anyone educated enough to find value in a moderate candidate would never have voted for Trump.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are taking advantage of the situation by ignoring voters telling him to stop genocide. They believe they can do whatever they want and voters will still reward him with another opportunity to keep doing it.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

The US has always been too easy on Israel. I agree that Biden needs to stand firm on his recent insistence of diplomacy after the attack, and take action if Netanyahu doesn’t agree to follow.

The honest truth is that none of the other choices will be better, and Trump will be far, far worse.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We can acknowledge that Trump is a fascist and people need to vote for Biden or there is a real possibility of not being able to vote again.

We can also acknowledge that as a result Democrats don't have to try very hard and can present a boring "mostly status quo" candidate under the banner of "what are you going to do, let a fascist win?"

Yes, it sucks. We can acknowledge it sucks. Personally I think the best way to correct course is if the Republicans lose hard to send the message that they need to be putting forward reasonable candidates to stand a chance, at which point it would be reasonable to not vote for disappointing Democratic candidates.

We can still acknowledge that what is being offered isn't stellar.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Democrats aren’t taking advantage

Yes, they absolutely are. It's why they're supporting the genocide every last centrist has always wanted. They can get away with it because the other option is worse.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

You think Trump would be better? Republicans have been bloodthirsty for an Iran conflict for decades.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

or any democracy for that matter

Australia sends its regards.

It is really nice knowing that I can safely vote for our "green" party without risking our conservative party getting in because the centre-left party loses too many votes.

Also, voting being mandatory (and very accessible) and on a Sunday for federal elections is such a game changer for ensuring participation.

Hopefully you guys can get reforms in at some point.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Low voter turnout benefits the Republican Party in the US because conservatives are more consistent voters. Reform requires 60 votes in the Senate out of 100. That makes it almost impossible because one of the major parties is not interested in reform.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The first Trump criminal trial starts tomorrow. Trump's fundraising is being crushed by Biden. RNC is hurting for cash and what is there is being gobbled up by Trump's lawyers. Down ballot candidates will have zero assistance.

Republicans are facing the most devastating defeat in their history. Polling has been garbage for two election cycles. Just look at the writing on the wall. Trump is running on fumes and it's only going to get worse.

[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (25 children)

Absolutely. Not voting is a vote for the candidate you don't like.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The neat part is that, for me, voting is also a vote for the candidate I don't like.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All of the above appears to be true. Trump is being slammed both in court and out, and Trump's fundraising is going to his legal bills while Biden's getting more money and needing to spend it on fewer things. The early polls were scary, for sure, but Bidens numbers are improving, possibly because we're getting more real pollsters in the polling, possibly because less invested people are tuning into the election and realising that as much as the past 4 years sucked, Trump's handling of COVID and his approach to governing are much worse.

Still. We need to be careful with 'we've got this in the bag' thinking. We don't call TFG 'Teflon Don' for nothing. That guy's got more lives than a cat, and is wileyer than a fox. And you know what he's going to do based on what he's accusing other people of doing. We have got to turn out in exceptional numbers and UTTERLY CRUSH TRUMP at the poll box. Even then, we may need to brush up on our self-defence skills because I wouldn't put it past Trump and his backers to actually start an honest-to-goodness coup complete with guns and armies if he loses it. I'm not going to rest until Biden is reinaugurated in 2025...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep. Not saying he isn't. This is a discussion about Biden vs third party dems.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I’m aware. They’re funded by GOP PACs, but running on moderate platforms, for one reason only.

To get Trump elected.

They know anyone educated enough to seek out a moderate candidate wouldn’t have voted for Trump in the first place.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As an outsider, I feel that the Democrats would have an easier time turning third parties over if they didn't push a dementia patient who could lose the last of his competency next term.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

It's not like the other duopoly is any better in that respect. It's functionally a draw in the age related problems category.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Polls are wildly conflicting. A recent Rasmussen survey found that Biden trails Trump regardless of third-party candidates.

In a two-way contest between Biden and Trump, 49% of likely US voters said they would choose Trump, and 41% would vote for Biden. That was a marginal increase for Trump since February, when he led by six points.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Rasmussen polls always tilt a few points slightly Republican for some reason. It's not necessarily malicious, but something in their methodology.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I refuse to believe it’s not by design. They’ve known the issue for years and others have produced far less biased polling

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Rasmussen is so dodgy that 538 dropped them from their models.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“This poll run by far right people says Biden is losing!” Shocker lol. They’re always skewed R

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Biden poses a danger to Biden. He's done nothing just like all prior democrats, to earn our vote. That sane hubris cost Hills an election that was hers to lose.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

/me points at giant pile of achievements.

What you smoking bro? There are extremely valid criticisms of Biden but "done nothing"? What kind of bubble do you live in that you're so utterly ignorant.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“Did he solve every single one of my problems?? Why did my wife leave me?? Biden is doing nothing to fix this!!!” - that guy probably

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

My partner has a migraine tonight. Is Biden responsible for the lack of anal? Thanks, Obama.

load more comments
view more: next ›