this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
980 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

15740 readers
1841 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Lives no more than twenty years

Sign me up!

[–] pressanykeynow@iusearchlinux.fyi 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

How old are you? It may still be doable.

[–] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I've lived two cat lives over and am on my way through a third

[–] z500@startrek.website 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The candle that burns four times as bright burns a quarter as long

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

... How dare you nerd snipe me

...

Now, if brightness is amplitude of light ... But is it? Is it like sound that we perceive logarithmically? And if it's burning wax at 4x the rate, will it be yet brighter because more of the gases ignite? Why is it burning faster? Has it four wicks? Thicker wick? Different geometry? Or does it imply a better oxygen source? If oxygen, again, maybe the same rate of wax burns brighter. Or maybe not: maybe it's as simple as, the same proportion of wax burns, releasing the same amount of light energy, in the same spectral distribution, as long as you stay within practical parameters (e.g. not hot enough to get secondary combustion - if that even happens for candle smoke). Okay so I think the candle burning 4x the rate will make 4x the light, in which case it's just a question of perception, but we can argue that brightness really is amplitude - or is it the square root because... bother my brain's gone blank but it's like an amplitude Vs magnitude thing but those are the same so it must be something else... But if we call amplitude brightness then I think yes, the same-mass candle burning at 4x brightness will burn out in a quarter of the time. Phew, I think I can correctly upvote your comment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Fuck you, shitass cats. Stop killing all the birds!

Keep your cats indoors, please.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.de 9 points 11 months ago (3 children)

This is misleading: Habitat destruction and lawns are a much greater threat to birds. If you do not like cats and want them gone that's fine. Don't use false/misleading information to further your point.

[–] icydefiance@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Our findings suggest that free-ranging cats cause substantially greater wildlife mortality than previously thought and are likely the single greatest source of anthropogenic mortality for US birds and mammals.

https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms2380

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

... Are you logically sound? None of what I said is mutually exclusive of lawns and habitat destruction.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Too much work.

Alternative plan, introduce new predatory birds.

[–] SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

The stray dogs outside keep my cat in.

[–] DudeDudenson@lemmings.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Someone had his pet bird killed

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What a great, well-developed sense of humor! Everyone loves talking with you! You must have no trouble dating, or making friends who actually contribute to society!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not to forget how flexible you are and where you can go with your tongue.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, but your tongue is covered in sandpaper.

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Hey, no kink shame :)

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I read that a tiger's tongue is so abrasive they can lick the skin right off your body.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Kill billions of birds and only the Aussies dare retaliate.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Cats team up with emus.

Humans leave Australia.

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What if cats just protect us from the gov*rnment?
c/birdsarentreal

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What if the cats are working with the government to get rid of malfunctioning drones

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] ManniSturgis@lemmy.zip 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Wait, which 3...this could be bad.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Most of these describe my gamer sister growing up. Cute, sleepy, etc.

I'll admit, hiding the bodies growing up was tough work!

[–] pressanykeynow@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Cats are easily the best looking being on the planet.

[–] tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

No they didn't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

forgot to add, "wake up humans at 2am and go back to sleep immediately afterwards"

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I started yelling at my cats randomly when they're sleeping just for a little payback.

[–] The_Tired_Horizon@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well two out of four aint bad.. 😅😉

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Sleeping all day and killing for fun 😎

[–] The_Tired_Horizon@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Doesnt say the attention has to be positive either. 😅😂

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I dispute "always cute." I knew a guy who had a cat that looked disturbingly similar to Mao Zedong. Like if Mao Zedong was a cat, he would look like that cat. I don't know how else to put it. But it sort of took away the cute factor and replaced it with a major creepiness one.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Do you also prefer the unavoidable estrus state that makes you horny against your will and takes over all your senses?

[–] TwoCubed@feddit.de 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If your holders are responsible people, this will never happen.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And they won't let you out to kill all the birds either.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Just a few. Not all of them.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

'Domestic' cats are the number one thing killing birds. I love my cats, but I don't let them outside unsupervised.

[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

While they physically kill the most birds by volume, the biggest decrease to bird populations is the ecological destruction of the environment. The pesticides we use actually make their egg shells non viable, but for some reason none of the studies count this figure in the "birds killed" category. It would double cats.

On top of that, we have deforestation wrecking their mating areas. People like to measure forestation in ground covered squared, while ignoring that the vast majority of migratory species only mate in specific areas.

Circling back to pesticides, the food supply has been wrecked. The food that is left avaliable is often filled with chemicals still that cause diseases, make their already fragile bones even weaker, cause feather malformation, blindness, organ failure, and cause outright sterilization.

But for some reason that's not listed in the "birds killed" figure.

Cats might kill a bunch of birds, but with a figure that's as broad as 1 to 4 billion, you need to question the validity of the argument and wonder why they leave so many other factors out of these figures.

It's the same kind of thing where they shame us for individual level consumption of pollutants and plastics, while corporations greatly outweigh consumers pollution. Both are a problem, yes cats do kill a shit load of birds, but this reddit level factoid keeps getting spread around and the reap threats aren't being educated on. You can't really say they're the "number one thing killing birds" unless you're using the figures that outright ignore other important information

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

OK? Either way they kill a shitload of birds unnecessarily. I don't spray pesticides, I buy local produce. I can control my cats, so I do that too. Side benefit is that they'll probably live longer since they won't encounter the same diseases and dangers as they would outside.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Death around every corner... they live a very exciting life

load more comments