this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
33 points (94.6% liked)

United Kingdom

12 readers
1 users here now

Main community for the Feddit UK instance

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I agree with the general idea or the article that restricting kids' play is stupid, but the author seems to be a bit of a moron himself:

Want a solution to the rights of children not getting upheld? Give pre-teenage kids the vote. I’d go with 10 years old, others say as young as six.

Not only is this dumb, it completely ignores the idea of parental responsibility - it's the parents who must look after the interests of their kids.

Such hot takes make the whole article immediately dismissable.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think that part was written as tongue in cheek, not a serious solution.

That said, I do wonder if something like the UK Youth Parliament could be given a greater voice in policy relating to children. It could help make our nation more child friendly, and encourage greater participation in democracy at a younger age.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I’ve got 4 children. They can barely be in charge of cleaning up after dinner.

So I’m sure they’ll do a better job than our current politicians.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

When I was in primary school we would play most of the day in reception and year 1, with the odd sessions to do work.

My son finished year 1 in July and there was zero in class play, all work.