I agree with the general idea or the article that restricting kids' play is stupid, but the author seems to be a bit of a moron himself:
Want a solution to the rights of children not getting upheld? Give pre-teenage kids the vote. I’d go with 10 years old, others say as young as six.
Not only is this dumb, it completely ignores the idea of parental responsibility - it's the parents who must look after the interests of their kids.
Such hot takes make the whole article immediately dismissable.