this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
608 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69545 readers
3550 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I can't imagine anyone that has decent prospects would agree to go back to Tesla after getting canned with those kinds of wild swings in decision making.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Announce large workforce cuts: line go up?

Announce large investment in workforce (even if it was just cut): line go up more?

I don't really get the logic that's going on the impulsive billionaire imbecile's mind.

Everyone being rehired to Tesla had better be asking for at least double for the trouble Musk put them through.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Double salary. Work from home. EZ.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Two weeks ago, Tesla CEO Elon Musk enacted widespread layoffs throughout the company, including the 500-strong team responsible for the brand's Supercharger.

Now, Tesla is looking to hire some of them back, Bloomberg reports, as Musk promises to spend $500 million expanding the network.

The layoffs also appeared to put Tesla's plan to build a more powerful charger that would benefit cars using 800 V or 900 V architectures, including Audi, Porsche, Lucid, and others, on hold.

But last week, Musk announced that Tesla would spend more than $500 million building out more chargers, just days after saying the focus would instead be on uptime at existing locations.

(At the time of the layoffs, Electrek reported that Musk got rid of the entire team because its Tinucci did not lay off enough workers on her own.)

In 2019, he decided to close all of Tesla's retail locations to pay for a cheaper version of the Model 3 sedan.


The original article contains 479 words, the summary contains 158 words. Saved 67%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Why would anyone go back for less?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It’s a common practice for companies to lay off high priced employees and then post those jobs for a lower amount. Why would they go back? If they’re smart they won’t. But some people need a job—at least until they can find another job.

It’s a bad practice either way, because these employees won’t ever feel their job is secure again, and that makes them care less about how the company does… as it should.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Did they not get severance?

I highly doubt these are generic wage slaves, I am would assume they can get jobs else where?

If they can't negotiate a fat raise under these circumstances, I am not really sure these people can negotiate at all lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You’d be surprised how many people lack negotiation skills. They think whatever is offered is what they get. I’ve coached many coworkers on how to play hardball with a smile.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

chad... good. plebs helping plebs fuck daddy :D

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Damn right. I love my company, but we have the money to pay well. I don’t want anyone working with me who feels like they are underpaid. We moved offices and it became a much longer commute for one of our juniors. I kept harassing my manger to give him a bump for the effort. He wouldn’t have taken the job with that commute, so we had to sweeten it for him. My manager said “his review is 6 months away” and I said “it’s not a raise, it’s for the inconvenience to his life.” Got him 10%—and got none of the credit, haha. But that’s okay, I feel good.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

My brother in business, I see you.

Once had to ask why the only woman our team was making significantly less. Got a shrug back from the HR director, a woman. I couldn't believe that I had to fight her to bring compensation in line.

It's not JUST the billionaires that are the problem. It's really all the people that need to feel they're somehow above others.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

It blew me away when I met these people. These real "keep your head down" folks.

When my company laid people off, and then did the shitty thing of rehire them back at a freelancing level, one gal cried tears of happiness that she was given another chance.

I just dont understand it. Like going back to your abuser.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Depends on their prospects.

For example right this moment, if my employer pulled this on me with a 10% pay cut, it's probably still better than my prospects in the open market at this moment. I would normally have a pretty strong network of connections, but at the moment they are all in hiring freezes, so I'd probably have to take a huge pay cut to find a job.

But you would be sure I'd be heavily watching my chances and leave as soon as I had a competitive offer on the table.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What are the job titles of the people on these teams? I would suppose physics and CS. How are those job sectors looking in terms of vacancies? I'd think that there are more workers than jobs and that this is a ploy to get less experienced people for cheaper but they're trying to rehire the same employees.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›