this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
319 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69658 readers
2502 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 93 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sony didn't care about consent when they put rootkits on millions of CDs.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

That was 20 years ago. Let it go

Besides, there must be more prescient examples of Sony being shit bags.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago

There was one just a few weeks ago with Helldivers 2 and requiring PSN accounts on pc even if you don't live in a country with PSN

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Don't like your first statement, but agree with your second.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Sony and 4 other companies basically own all music. If they can opt out, it gives them a defacto monopoly on any music generators. The AI music is still going to come and artists aren't getting a dime either way except maybe some big names that don't need the money anyways.

There is nothing to be gained from taking Sony's side here. Sony is a pos company that exploits all the artists under it. It will exploit it's data to create more profit through AI, without paying them.

Its either open source AI anyone can run at home or closed source AI that only a few companies can legally run, offered with a hefty subscription fee and censorship.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

4?

Sony, universal and Warner are the big 3. Who are you could ting as the 4th? BMG?

company that exploits all the artists under it.

In the sense that all Labour under capitalism is exploitative, maybe, but otherwise Sony is pretty well liked among its artists.

But I agree with the rest of what you said.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

or an in house solution. Sony is big enough to build out their own team for it. I could see that making sense. i think Sony probably has the best bet out of the companies that own all of the music. they could be positioned to be the only ones capable of making a music "ai"

[–] [email protected] 56 points 11 months ago

Opts out?

Look, if we’re going to have draconian copyright laws, then we should at least be able to count on works being used without permission for AI to be verboten like all the other uses.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago

Good luck with that lol

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

So they're protective of their OWN media libraries, but when its customers libraries "fuck em"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Am I missreading the prohibition of analysis? Correlations?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I see Sony is going down the IBM route for AI. 40 years from now they'll be kicking themselves in the teeth.