Grimy

joined 2 years ago
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If anyone is ever in this situation: Don't lie about small stupid stuff like this. Only lie about the big things.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

I understand the sentiment but I think it's foolhardy.

  • The job losses still occur
  • The handful of companies able to pay for the data have a defecto monopoly (Google, OpenAI)
  • That monopoly is used to keep the price tag of state of the art AI tools above consumer levels (your boss can afford to replace you but you can't afford to compete against him with the same tools).

And all that mostly benefiting the data holders and big ai companies. Most image data is on platforms like Getty, Deviant Art, Instagram, etc. It's even worse for music and lit, where three record labels and five publishers own most of it.

If we don't get a proper music model before the lawsuits pass, we will never be able to generate music without being told what is or isn't okay to write about.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I think it will be punished, but not how we hope. The laws will end up rewarding the big data holders (Getty, record labels, publishers) while locking out open source tools. The paywalls will stay and grow. It'll just formalize a monopoly.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

It shouldn't be much of a problem using a gibli based model with img2img. I personally use forge as my main ui, models can be found on civitai.com . It's easily possible, you just need a bit of vram and setting it up is more work. You might get more mileage by using controlnet in conjunction with img2img.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

I'm surprised it isn't a life time ban.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

It is scary the amount of people in this thread that actually think art is defined by how it is made, and not the emotions and thoughts it elicits.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I'm not sure if grok is winning here but Lilly is definitely losing.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The responsable thing would be to put a rule stating her picture and personal information must be blurred. Its a harassment campaign and the community you created is essentially amplifying it.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You can print out cards in physical TCG and put them in your deck as well. You can't sell virtual cards but they are also free for the most part.

I think regular TCG with its 8$ boosters is much worse. I had a lot more fun playing MTG arena without spending a dime then the hundreds I put into the physical cards while playing once in a blue moon with them.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Imagine wanting to live in a world where you can copyright styles.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Thanks for the break down. I've seen Jordan criticize Israel multiple times, he's never once defended them as far as I'm concerned. It does indeed seem like baseless malicious accusations.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Same can't be said for the snacks though. Highway robbery, I tell ya.

 

 

Israeli forces strapped explosives around the neck of an elderly Palestinian man in Gaza and forced him to act as a human shield before killing him and his wife, an investigation by the Israeli news website HaMakom has revealed.

An Israeli soldier told HaMakom that after explosives were placed around the Palestinian man's neck, he was told "that if he does something wrong or not the way we want, the person behind him will pull the rope and his head will detach from the body."

"That's how he walked around with us for eight hours, even though he's an 80-year-old man and even though he couldn't run away from us. And that's knowing that there's a soldier behind him who can pull the rope at any second – and he's done," the soldier added.

According to HaMakom, after the elderly Palestinian was forced to enter homes and tunnel allegedly used by Hamas, the soldiers ordered him and his wife to leave the area for al-Mawasi, a small area that at the time was just 1km wide and was being used to house hundreds of thousands of Palestinians.

However, HaMakom said that no other battalions were informed that the couple would be making their way south and within 100 metres of being allowed to leave they were both shot dead.

493
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Grimy@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Decoupling America’s Artificial Intelligence Capabilities from China Act of 2025’’.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITIONS ON IMPORT AND EXPORT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE OR GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY OR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

(a) PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION.—On and after the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the importation into the United States of artificial intelligence or generative artificial intelligence technology or intellectual property developed or produced in the People’s Republic of China is prohibited.

Currently, China has the best open source models in text, video and music generation.

 

Summary:

The launch of Chinese AI application DeepSeek in the U.S. has raised national security concerns among officials, lawmakers, and cybersecurity experts. The app quickly became the most downloaded on Apple's store, disrupting Wall Street and causing a record 17% drop in Nvidia's stock. The White House announced an investigation into the potential risks, with some lawmakers calling for stricter export controls to prevent China from leveraging U.S. technology.

Beyond economic impact, experts warn DeepSeek may pose significant data security risks, as Chinese law allows government access to company-held data. Unlike TikTok, which stores U.S. data on Oracle servers, DeepSeek operates directly from China, collecting personal user information. The app also exhibits censorship, blocking content on politically sensitive topics like Tiananmen Square. Some analysts argue that, as an open-source model, DeepSeek may not be as concerning as TikTok, but critics worry its widespread adoption could advance China’s influence through curated information control.

 

I'm not sure if this is the best place for this post, I'm just curious to see what everybody else thinks.

It seems like a lot of communities (outside lemmy) have had enough and are banning twitter links after Elons recent Nazi salute.

 

With the recent talks of UAPs because of the current events over the UK and New Jersey, I'd love to hear your experiences.

view more: next ›