this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
208 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

8304 readers
2840 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 113 points 1 year ago (15 children)

My friend said to me the other day “why did democrats nominate such a weak candidate?” To which I asked since given the fact that weak and strong are relative terms, can you point out 1 specific aspect where Biden is weaker than his opponent? She had no answer other than “he is just weak”

Don’t let these fuckers gaslight you in thinking the convicted felon with 90+ indictments and a wannabe dictator is somehow stronger than the alternative.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

He's a weak candidate because he's a tepid aged rich guy who only loosely reflects what his base wants and is incapable of delivering the level of change the historic moment requires.

He's uninspiring. The US desperately needs large scale institutional change. With how broken those institutions are, that's going to require a groundswell of public support, something that can only be done by an inspiring reform candidate, not an establishment figure.

I'm still voting for him, but I'm (eternally) disappointed in the short sighted cowardice of the democratic party.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

a tepid aged rich guy who only loosely reflects what his base wants and is incapable of delivering the level of change the historic moment requires.

I mean, green energy, student loans, proper actual judges, high-speed rail, decriminalized weed, support for Ukraine, prosecuting trump for at least one of his many many crimes, increased school funding, etc etc and that was with half his term under a batshit republiQan House that can barely not hold up revenge porn in public hearings.

Goddamn, whatever.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

He’s uninspiring

Such a weird statement to me. Why would anyone expect to be 'inspired' by a politician? They're tools to represent your interests in government. If there's someone running that does that better- vote for them. Really wish people could be more boring and practical about politics. All this emotional sentiment does no one any good.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because he’s the leader of the nation. An essential component of good leadership is the ability to inspire others.

The fact remains that there is no other option which is shameful.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A US president is the elected executive and commander-in-chief of a democracy. I get that simple people need to follow 'leaders' but I thank goodness the US was built on the idea that we devote ourselves to institutions and offices, not the people we choose to temporarily occupy them. Inspire yourself to participate in democracy, don't depend on 'leaders' for anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you think the Maga crowd is not inspired by Trump? Getting people excited is basically the entire purpose of candidates. Obama was amazing at it, Trump is pretty good, and Biden isn't.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Somebody figured out that a lot of human judgement comes down to groupthink. If you see a bunch of people who are clearly operating guided by some assumptions, then you'll take those assumptions on and start being guided by them, whether the people you saw were real or fake.

Then, a few years ago, it became cheap and easy to flood both social media and news media with restatements of whatever assumptions you want people to pretend that are guided by.

And so, behold: The economy is crashing, which is all Biden's fault, and he's a weak candidate who loves genocide. Everyone's disappointed in him. Everyone knows all these things and sees them all the time. The simple repetition is actually a very solid system for producing the public opinion you want to produce.

At the present moment, they are trying to do it tactically with the "anyone who is disagreeing with me is trying to silence me, in fact they are literally hitting me in the face (also! Note that I'm allowed to disagree with whoever I want)" narrative -- simply repeating it, over and over, in the hopes (probably pretty well founded) that people will start to absorb it and behave the way they want them to behave.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At the present moment, they are trying to do it tactically with the “anyone who is disagreeing with me is trying to silence me, in fact they are literally hitting me in the face (also! Note that I’m allowed to disagree with whoever I want)” narrative – simply repeating it, over and over, in the hopes (probably pretty well founded) that people will start to absorb it and behave the way they want them to behave.

Social media is both a blessing and a curse. Depending on context you might think a little of both at any given time.

I hope you do keep engaging with it. The easy thing to do would be to ignore the alarms, but it's not the smartest.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your selfless and forward-thinking actions in support of the Democrats, and left wing goals, are plain to see. That's totally the result. It's instantly obvious.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope it's obvious I could say the same thing about you, by not pushing harder for better.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Biden is ancient and incomprehensible in half of his public appearances. Not saying Trump isn't, but his people love his crazy rambling.

It is not unreasonable for people to be disappointed. They are being forced to choose between two dementia riddled candidates. The only people who truly think Trump would be the better alternative are dumbass "centrists" and conservatives.

Yes, lesser evil voting is good, but you can't shame people for not smiling while smelling shit.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The question isn't whether or not he is weaker than the other candidate. The question was, would a better Democratic candidate have stood a better chance? I think you're misrepresenting what your friend had said.

It's actually kind of rude how you're depicting them right now, as some sort of buffoon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Public perception and narrative is where Biden is weak. Seeming physically feeble. There's a number of ways. I'm going to vote for him, but don't just yourself. You're sleepwalking towards the grave.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Don't let anyone gaslight you into thinking that your vote is the only thing that matters.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course not. You still have to do the dishes.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'll do the dishes when I'm eating the food. I'm not going to just clean up after the neoliberals while they let me starve at the kids table.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can sit with the adults anytime you’re able to stop stuffing peas up your nose and making farting noises with your armpit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Which angle am I supposed to read this from? That Biden's critics are being duplicitous, or that Biden's supporters are being repressive?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Based on OP's post history, it's meant to be against Batman (and Biden) here. Post has the opposite effect though lol

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

I for real saw it and thought, yes, that is 100% the correct response at this point 😃. I mean I don't think extensive criticism is the same as hitting them in the face, but metaphorically speaking, yes, it sounds good.

When there have been 2-3 extensive discussions on your viewpoint, then okay sure, that's your free speech and we are here for political discussion whether or not I agree with it.

Once it reaches 20 or 30 times and you're still doing it multiple times per day every single day from multiple accounts and totally unresponsive to people pointing out every time objective flaws in it, I think we can start hitting you in the face as soon as you start.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I gotta be honest, I seriously had a lot of support for Batman when I first saw it 🙂.

I mean the whole premise is hilarious. Disagreeing with them is not the same as hitting them in the face, obviously, and of course they're not planning on stopping disagreeing with anyone around them or yelling their viewpoint at people who don't want to hear it. It's the standard conservative tactic of "how DARE you do back to me a lesser version of what I did to you, actually specifically in response to me doing it to you, that's literally oppression so unreasonable and I'm a total victim now and how dare you."

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Choose your own adventure!

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I know it's good in this instance that Biden is likely to win because he can out spend the orange one, but I still find it crazy that your politics is just about who has the deepest pockets. Spending limits are a thing for a reason.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

It's not. In 2016 Bloomberg outspent the other candidates by orders of ten and still lost horribly. Bernie raised funds from his electoral base and came to be a close contender to Clinton. You just can't fix shit personality with money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I sort of don’t have problems with Biden.

Biden is the most liberal President that the Democratic Party has allowed to become president since Jimmy Carter. And that’s cool.

But after 40+ years of both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party getting on their knees to give the sloppiest, messiest blowjobs for corporate America, the Republican Party lacks the ability to govern, and the Democratic Party lacks the ability to lead, and neither have any intention of doing anything to benefit U.S. citizens unless it either benefits the wealthy most or is needed to improve their chances of reelection.

I feel like this messaging is reductive and stupid. The problem is not people being anti-Biden. The problem is a broken-ass system and political parties that hope we don’t realize it.
The exceptionally stupid thing is that Republicans want to tear the system down and take it over, and the Democratic Party seems to think that is a cute point to campaign on, rather than an existential fucking crisis that they aren’t taking seriously because they’re afraid if they pull that corporate dick out their mouth and start actually embracing the will of the people that they won’t have the funds to campaign.

But anyway, Grampa Joe is fine.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly, best case scenario is that the Dems get a big enough win that the GoP tears themselves apart trying to pin the blame, and ends up collapsing. Then the Democrat party splits due to some seeing a void, and the US gets a hard shift left with the new right wing party being only marginally more right wing than the Democrat party is now

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

I'd have the same response to "If the Cowboys want to win this year..." if I gave two shits about football.

At best it's just mindless armchair politics. Nobody cares what you think Biden 'should do'. If it's not obvious to you that he's the best option you can stfu and vote Trump.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Too bad the cowboys don't need their fans on the field in order to win

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They need their fans in order to exist. But to no one's surprise you missed the point entirely.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yup, so maybe they shouldn't be slapping them across the face.

I'm not surprised you've missed the point, either

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Oh, please stfu. No one is oppressing you or the idiots with this same rhetoric. You motherfuckers and trumpers have a lot of things in common but the one that stands out the most is the victimization.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So in this analogy the Cowboys are slapping rando armchair quarterbacks in the face by not caring what rando armchair quarterbacks think?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Democracy is quite literally random armchair quarterbacks deciding what to do as a team.

Their opinion is literally the entire game.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Except the US is a representative democracy so you vote for quarterbacks, not plays. Armchair quarterbacks are just regular citizens with delusions of grandeur.

You can call your quarterback and tell them what plays you think they should make. But babbling to strangers about what the quarterback should do is just that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trump supporters have way too much free time.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, anyone who's not volunteering to fondle Joe Biden's balls is a Trump supporter. /s

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'm not the biggest fan of genocide Joe myself, but when it's the only thing you post about 24/7, people are going to start to get suspicious of your motives.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I kinda get it, but I would argue that Trump/the republicans have gone so far beyond parody, that it's actually become way too hard to make memes about them.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

It's every day with this one.

load more comments
view more: next ›