this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
299 points (100.0% liked)

science

18330 readers
290 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/16488358

Scientists Find Plastic-Eating Fungus Feasting on Great Pacific Garbage Patch

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 70 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Sounds like great news, no?

Just as we had a time before fungus digesting plant matter, we've now had a time before fungus digesting plastics.

"Soon" we'll get bacteria and insects doing the same, and all our plastic buildings will need to be protected just as the wood ones.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 11 months ago

Can't wait to get a fungus infection that starts eating the micro plastics in my testicles.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago

I guess all plastic will be biodegradable eventually.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Not really good news for the plastic that isnt waste. Plastic pipes or structures in buildings that were meant to last decades we dont want eaten away by fungus

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Still it’s a positive net balance for the planet if it happens this way. But I think the “plastic safety” (in a food sense) would also end?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

“The planet” doesn’t have interests so everything is neutral to the planet

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

To say nothing of how much cabling is covered by plastic.

Audio

Video

Vehicular

Aviation

Appliances...

...Telecommunications...

...Power...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

For earth and the surviving creatures on it this is probably great news, but this is probably going to be a problem for humans in the short term. Plastic is this magic material that is immune to degradation and microbes, now that is no longer the case.

Ultimately that will be a good thing, but think about sanitized plastic medical equipment, now it can slowly be eaten up by microbes that we didn't have to worry about before.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Yup. Plastic's main selling point, it's durability, is no longer going to be a factor when choosing it as a material.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 11 months ago (2 children)

"Nature finds a way" -- Dr. Ian Malcolm

The plastic simply was a too nice of an energy source to be left aside by microorganisms. There are microorganisms for basically any energy source the world provides. There are bacteria that live on undersea volcanoes feasting on acids and carbon dioxide, so a fungus eating plastic is no actual surprise.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Unless you include the “uh” in that quote I can’t hear Jeff Goldblum say it, and that’s a trigger I didn’t know it had. So, thanks?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Also he said life, not nature.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

"Life, uh, not nature" doesn't have the same ring to it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

It also impresses me that there’s bacteria eating metal under the sea.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"...at a rate of roughly 0.05 percent per day ... would take a very long time" ... but by my quick calculation 0.9995^3650 is 84% per decade, which is not long. Almost instantaneous on a geological timescale - and think how much the world changed when fungi learned how to digest lignin in wood - ending the era of coal-forming swamps.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 11 months ago

It's going to be a significantly different number than that. You have to factor in growth rate in a resource-abundant environment as well as reduced access to food sources as more of the patch is consumed. But yeah, you're right that's actually a very fast rate of consumption of a non-naturally-renewing food source.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I can't tell if it's a good news or bad news.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Fungus are great news, the best nonplant plant in the ecosystem

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Ahem, Mammals would like a word with you. MAMMALS RULE, FUNGUS DROOLS!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's mamals who generally drool though

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Slime mold would like to have a drooly word.

[–] CheapFrottage 2 points 11 months ago

James Acaster has entered the chat

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Assuming it doesn't evolve the ability to digest human flesh after it eats all the plastic, I think this is great news.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 11 months ago (1 children)

An interesting scifi plot could be where said fungi start hungering for the microplastics within us...

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago

First they came for our patch then they came for our balls

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Assuming you don't have the immune system of a plastic bottle you will be fine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

All in all good news. It means less plastic and more biomass.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yup, if we can sequester the extra CO2 in the biomass part of the carbon cycle I think that's the best solution, it doesn't fight life on the planet, instead it works with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I would really like to know what's the resulting materials after the breaking down, but the article doesn't say :(

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Well, given what we know about most commercial plastics, which are all derived from oil/complex hydrocarbons, the consumed plastic could be broken down into condensed carbon? Or would it be carbon gases? I'm speculating based on just what I know about plastics, what they are and how they're made.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

So, a byproduct of this process is, potentially, greenhouse gases? Yay.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

And some toxic compounds.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

I've heard living organisms tend to output carbondioxide

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

That's because this narrative is at odds with another environmentalist narrative.

Carbon compounds are oxidized by non plant organisms to form carbon dioxide.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

The resulting material is fungus? That’s how eating works

[–] [email protected] 29 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There's a lot of discussion in here about how great this is. And it is. But it is at odds with another environmentalist concern.

What if we could take carbon dioxide and turn it into something that can't be degraded by living organisms? Well, plastic is one of those things, or was. Plastic is a form of carbon sequestration.

These micro organisms, they're turning plastic into carbon dioxide. Any and all carbon compounds on earth will enter the carbon cycle. every drop of oil pulled out of the ground, even the stuff that's used to make plastic, will wind up in the atmosphere.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well, sure. And that's really bad for Ice Age evolved macro-species that require a certain survivable temperature and condition to thrive. But you're missing the bigger picture. For lots of plants and bacteria and various insecticidal organisms that thrive in hot, humid environments, this is going to be absolutely amazing.

Yes, humans are absolutely fucked, along with enormous chunks of the mammalian class of species. But life will continue on in exciting new ways.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Algea and algea adjacent species, mostly.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Conveniently, nature has provided us with another carbon sequestration method that has a lot of other benefits, ranging from being a good building material, to helping regulate the local temperature: trees.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Yep, I concur. I'm of the opinion that that's all you need to solve this problem.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago

Like good news right but also fuck my life

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If I recall correctly, the Andromeda Strain mutated into a form that ate plastic.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Both books written by Michael Crichton so very fitting.

Before he went full-on raging anti-climate change nut.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Came here for this GIF, thank you for having it ready.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This may all SEEM fine & dandy, but..

The such ocean gyres, if I'm remembering what they're called correctly, had a normal, established-for-millions-of-years kind-of-ecology in them..

NOW, however, we're forcing that this fungus become a dominant-player in them..

WHAT DOES THAT FUNGUS DO TO THE OTHER ORGANISMS IN THAT ECOLOGY?


( people may remember some years ago when the Purple Loostrife we imported was killing all our North American marshes, turning them into thickets of woody stems/runners/etc, & each individual plant could put out 50,000 seeds per year...

So, the Canadian Gov't did test after test after test, & finally resolved that a .. Chinese, iirc, ladybird bug ate the stuff, but didn't eat any other plants..

so, they imported them & let them loose..

You know those new orange ladybird bugs?

the ones that bite animals?

Those are the ones, ttbomk.

They don't eat any other plants, other than purple loostrife, but their habit of biting us means that carnivorism is normal in them, and .. how does that affect the ecology??

You can't just arbitrarily alter ecologies & responsibly expect them to remain functionally-balanced, & in-harmony: consequences tend to multiply each-other, & tipping-points do get crossed. )

_ /\ _

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The ecology changes until a new balance is reached. People can be a bit overly fatalist about these realities. Its not like we've never witnessed an ecology change before.

But the more carbon we put into the atmosphere, the more this tiger-by-the-tail we've got called Climate Change is worked up. Bad news if your civilization craves stability.

load more comments
view more: next ›